CVE-2022-43774
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe HandlerPageP_KID class in Delta Electronics DIAEnergy v1.9 contains a SQL Injection flaw that could allow an attacker to gain code execution on a remote system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the HandlerPageP_KID class of Delta Electronics DIAEnergy v1.9 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution, likely through database features like xp_cmdshell or similar mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm DIAEnergy installation and versionLocate the DIAEnergy installation directory. Check for version information in the application metadata, about page, or version file typically found in the web root or installation folder. Compare against affected version 1.9.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.9.0
-
Identify HandlerPageP_KID endpoint exposureInspect the web application's routing or URL patterns to determine if the HandlerPageP_KID class is exposed as a web-accessible handler. Look for .ashx, .aspx, or similar handler mappings in web.config that reference HandlerPageP_KID.Affected if HandlerPageP_KID is mapped and accessible via HTTP(s) on the web server
-
Verify database connectivity configurationExamine the application's configuration files (such as web.config, app.config, or connection strings) to identify database connection parameters. Confirm the application connects to a SQL Server database.Affected if The application is configured to use Microsoft SQL Server as its backend database
-
Check for xp_cmdshell availabilityReview database user privileges and SQL Server configuration. Determine if the database user account used by the application has permissions sufficient to enable and execute xp_cmdshell or similar stored procedures.Affected if The application database user has elevated privileges that could permit xp_cmdshell execution
A user is affected if DIAEnergy version 1.9.0 is installed, the HandlerPageP_KID handler is web-accessible, and the application uses SQL Server with a database user that could potentially execute xp_cmdshell.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations in the HandlerPageP_KID class and related components. Apply vendor patch if available and restrict database privileges to limit impact of potential injection.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43774 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43774 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data