CVE-2022-44211
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 Incorrect access control allows a remote attacker to access/change devices' settings.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 suffers from incorrect access control that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access and modify device settings. The vulnerability stems from missing or insufficient authorization checks in the web interface or API, enabling attackers to bypass authentication and directly interact with device management functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if GL.iNet Goodcloud is installedCheck for Goodcloud processes or installed packages on the device. On GL.iNet routers, look for goodcloud daemon or check /etc/config/goodcloud in the configuration.Affected if Goodcloud software is present on the device
-
Determine the Goodcloud versionCheck the installed Goodcloud version. On GL.iNet devices, you can run 'opkg list-installed | grep goodcloud' or check the Goodcloud interface version in the web UI.Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or lower (versions <= 1.0 are affected)
-
Verify management interface network exposureCheck if the Goodcloud web interface or API ports (typically 8443, 8080, or vendor-specific ports) are listening on external/ WAN interfaces. Use 'netstat -tuln' or 'ss -tuln' to list listening ports and their binding addresses.Affected if The Goodcloud management interface is bound to WAN or publicly accessible IP addresses
-
Test authentication enforcement on the web interfaceAttempt to access Goodcloud endpoints directly without credentials. Check if the login page or device settings are accessible without providing valid authentication tokens.Affected if Device settings or API functions are accessible without authentication (the vulnerability condition)
A user is affected if Goodcloud version 1.0 or lower is installed and its management interface is accessible without requiring authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided security patches for Goodcloud 1.1. If patches are unavailable, restrict network exposure by placing management interfaces behind VPNs or firewalls, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44211 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44211 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data