EyoucmsApplication

CVE-2022-44387

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Basic Information component under the Edit Member module.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 affecting the Basic Information component within the Edit Member module. An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into unknowingly submitting requests to modify member profile data due to missing anti-CSRF token validation.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all forms in the Edit Member module and validate tokens server-side. Additionally, configure SameSite attribute on session cookies and validate Origin/Referer headers as defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EyoucmsApplication
Affected:= 1.5.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify EyouCMS version
    Locate the version file or footer of the EyouCMS installation. Common locations include /application/config.php, a version.php file in the root directory, or view the page source of any admin panel page to find version metadata.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.5.9 (or a version within the 1.5.9 release line)
  2. Confirm Edit Member module access
    Log into the EyouCMS administrator panel and navigate to the member management section. Locate the Edit Member or member profile modification interface.
    Affected if The Edit Member module is accessible and functional in the admin panel
  3. Inspect Edit Member form for anti-CSRF tokens
    View the HTML source of the Edit Member form (right-click > View Page Source or use browser developer tools). Search for hidden input fields containing tokens, such as those named __token, csrf_token, _token, or similar. Also check if the form includes any token-related attributes.
    Affected if The form lacks hidden anti-CSRF token fields or the token validation is not implemented
  4. Check session cookie SameSite attribute
    Log into the admin panel and use browser developer tools (Application tab > Cookies) to inspect the session cookie. Look for the SameSite attribute value.
    Affected if The session cookie does not have SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax configured
  5. Verify Origin/Referer header validation
    Submit a request to the Edit Member endpoint with a modified or missing Origin/Referer header using a proxy tool. Observe if the server rejects the request or processes it regardless.
    Affected if The server accepts requests without validating Origin or Referer headers

A user is affected if running EyouCMS version 1.5.9 and the Edit Member forms lack anti-CSRF token protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all forms in the Edit Member module and validate tokens server-side. Additionally, configure SameSite attribute on session cookies and validate Origin/Referer headers as defense-in-depth.

Fix this in Eyoucms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44387 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data