CVE-2022-44468
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager version 6.5.14 (and earlier) is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If a low-privileged attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.14 and earlier contain a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The flaw allows a low-privilege attacker to inject malicious JavaScript into a URL parameter that gets reflected back to the victim's browser without proper sanitization, executing within the context of the victim's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.15.0< 2022.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the product info via the Help menu. Alternatively, query the /system/console/info or look for the version file in the crx-quickstart folder.Affected if The installed version is below 6.5.15.0 for on-premise, or below 2022.10.0 for AEM Cloud Service.
-
Identify if running AEM Cloud ServiceCheck if the environment is hosted on Adobe's cloud infrastructure. Cloud Service instances will have 'cloud.adobe.com' in the admin URL or show Cloud Service in the system information.Affected if Running AEM Cloud Service with a version earlier than 2022.10.0.
-
Locate the vulnerable reflected parameterReview the AEM logs or application traffic for URL parameters that accept user input and are reflected back in the response without encoding. Common endpoints include search, filter, or navigation parameters.Affected if A URL parameter accepts user input and reflects it back in the HTML response without proper output encoding or input validation.
-
Verify input validation is missingInspect the application's response when submitting special characters (such as <, >, ", ', or script tags) in any reflected URL parameter. Check if the application returns these characters unescaped in the HTML.Affected if Special characters submitted in URL parameters are returned verbatim in the page source without HTML encoding.
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.15.0 (on-premise) or below 2022.10.0 (Cloud Service), AND user-supplied URL parameters are reflected in responses without HTML encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.15.02022.10.0
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2022-44468 to upgrade Adobe Experience Manager beyond version 6.5.14, or implement output encoding and input validation on the vulnerable endpoint as an interim measure.
AEM on-premise: 6.5.15.0+ | AEM Cloud Service: 2022.10.0+
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager upgrade documentation at helpx.adobe.com for your deployment type (on-premise or Cloud Service)
- Ensure you have a complete backup of your AEM instance and content repository before proceeding
- For AEM on-premise: Upgrade from any version < 6.5.15.0 to version 6.5.15.0 or later
- For AEM Cloud Service: Upgrade your environment to the 2022.10.0 release or later
- After upgrading, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing with the previously vulnerable URL patterns
- Review and test custom code or third-party integrations after the upgrade to ensure compatibility
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44468 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data