CVE-2022-44518
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAcrobat Reader DC version 22.001.20085 (and earlier), 20.005.3031x (and earlier) and 17.012.30205 (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Acrobat Reader DC contains a use-after-free memory corruption vulnerability in its JavaScript engine. A specially crafted malicious PDF file can trigger the vulnerability when opened, leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. The flaw affects multiple version branches (2022, 2020, and 2017) across both Continuous and Classic tracks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.008.20082, <= 22.001.20085>= 15.008.20082, <= 22.001.20085>= 17.011.30059, <= 17.012.30205>= 20.001.30005, <= 20.005.30314>= 20.001.30005, <= 20.005.30311>= 17.011.30059, <= 17.012.30205>= 20.001.30005, <= 20.005.30314>= 20.001.30005, <= 20.005.30311CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Acrobat or Reader installationOpen the application, go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat Reader (or About Adobe Acrobat). Note the exact version number displayed in the dialog.Affected if version is within 15.008.20082 to 22.001.20085 for DC products, or 17.011.30059 to 17.012.30205 / 20.001.30005 to 20.005.30314 (or 20.005.30311) for Classic products
-
Confirm product track typeLook at the version number format - DC versions follow the 22.x pattern (Continuous track), Classic versions follow 17.x or 20.x patterns with three-digit build numbers.Affected if track matches an affected version range in the CVE documentation
-
Check JavaScript preference settingIn Acrobat/Reader, go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript. Verify whether 'Enable Adobe JavaScript' is checked.Affected if JavaScript is enabled and the version falls within affected ranges - this is required for the exploit to trigger
-
Review PDF handling behaviorInspect how PDF files are opened in the environment - note if users routinely open PDF attachments or files from untrusted sources.Affected if users open PDF files from untrusted sources while running a vulnerable version with JavaScript enabled
User is affected if their installed Adobe Acrobat/Reader version falls within the listed affected ranges AND JavaScript is enabled AND they open specially crafted malicious PDF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Adobe Acrobat Reader DC to the latest patched version (22.001.20142 or later for Continuous track, 20.005.30417 or later for Classic 2020, 17.012.30253 or later for Classic 2017). Until patched, avoid opening PDF files from untrusted sources and disable JavaScript in Reader preferences.
Acrobat Reader DC 22.001.20093 or later; Acrobat DC 22.001.20093 or later; Acrobat/Reader 20.x: 20.005.30334 or later; Acrobat/Reader 17.x: 17.012.30210 or later
- Open Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Acrobat Reader
- Go to Help > Check for Updates
- Allow the application to check for available updates
- Download and install the latest security update provided by Adobe
- Alternatively, download the latest version from the official Adobe website: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ (for Reader) or https://get.adobe.com/acrobat/ (for Acrobat)
- Restart the application after installation
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed release for your product line
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44518 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44518 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data