FemanagerTYPO3 extension · In2code

CVE-2022-44543

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.5.2 / 6.3.3 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The femanager extension before 5.5.2, 6.x before 6.3.3, and 7.x before 7.0.1 for TYPO3 allows creation of frontend users in restricted groups (if there is a usergroup field on the registration form). This occurs because the usergroup.inList protection mechanism is mishandled.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The femanager TYPO3 extension before version 5.5.2/6.3.3/7.0.1 fails to properly enforce the usergroup.inList protection during frontend user registration, allowing attackers to manipulate the usergroup field to assign newly created users to restricted or privileged groups that should be protected from self-registration.

MitigationUpgrade femanager extension to version 5.5.2, 6.3.3, or 7.0.1 or later to receive the fix for the mishandled usergroup.inList protection mechanism.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FemanagerTYPO3 extension
Affected:< 5.5.2>= 6.0.0, < 6.3.3= 7.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify femanager extension version
    Locate the femanager extension in your TYPO3 installation (typically in typo3conf/ext/femanager or via composer vendor) and read the version from ext_emconf.php or composer.json
    Affected if Installed version is less than 5.5.2, or greater than or equal to 6.0.0 but less than 6.3.3, or exactly 7.0.0
  2. Confirm frontend user registration is active
    Check if the femanager plugin is configured on a frontend page or if createUser functionality is enabled in the extension configuration or TypoScript setup
    Affected if Frontend user registration using femanager is enabled and accessible
  3. Verify usergroup.inList protection exists
    Examine the TYPO3 TSconfig or femanager extension configuration for the usergroup.inList setting that specifies which user groups are allowed during self-registration
    Affected if usergroup.inList is not configured or does not properly restrict the groups that can be assigned

Your environment is affected if femanager version is within the vulnerable range AND frontend user registration is enabled AND the usergroup.inList protection is either missing or not properly enforced during registration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.5.2 / 6.3.3 or later
Fixed in 5.5.26.3.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade femanager extension to version 5.5.2, 6.3.3, or 7.0.1 or later to receive the fix for the mishandled usergroup.inList protection mechanism.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to Femanager version 5.5.2, 6.3.3, or 7.0.1 (depending on your current major version line)

  1. Backup your TYPO3 installation and database before proceeding
  2. Update the Femanager extension using Composer (composer require friendsoftypo3/femanager:^5.5.2 for version 5.x, ^6.3.3 for version 6.x, or ^7.0.1 for version 7.x) or via the TYPO3 Extension Manager
  3. Clear all TYPO3 caches after the update
  4. Verify that frontend user registration still works correctly and that the usergroup.inList protection is functioning as expected

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Femanager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44543 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44543 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data