TeamcityApplication · Jetbrains

CVE-2022-44623

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2022.10 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In JetBrains TeamCity version before 2022.10, Project Viewer could see scrambled secure values in the MetaRunner settings

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In JetBrains TeamCity versions before 2022.10, users with the Project Viewer role could see scrambled secure values in MetaRunner settings. This constitutes an information disclosure vulnerability where sensitive configuration values were exposed to unauthorized low-privilege users.

MitigationUpgrade TeamCity to version 2022.10 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TeamcityApplication
Affected:< 2022.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed TeamCity version
    Access the TeamCity administration dashboard and navigate to 'About' or check the server startup logs for the version number
    Affected if The version is listed as anything before 2022.10 (e.g., 2022.09, 2022.04, etc.)
  2. Check for Project Viewer role usage
    Navigate to User Management in TeamCity admin and review roles assigned to users; look for any users explicitly assigned the Project Viewer role
    Affected if Any user accounts have the Project Viewer role assigned
  3. Review MetaRunner configurations for secure values
    Navigate to Administration > MetaRunners and inspect each MetaRunner for parameters marked as 'password', 'secure', or 'hidden' type values
    Affected if MetaRunners exist that contain secure/password type parameters storing sensitive values
  4. Verify Project Viewer access to MetaRunner settings
    As a user with Project Viewer role (only), attempt to view MetaRunner configurations and observe whether scrambled/encoded secure values are visible in the settings
    Affected if A Project Viewer user can access and view MetaRunner settings containing visible (even if scrambled) secure parameter values

Your environment is affected if you run any TeamCity version before 2022.10 AND have MetaRunners with secure values configured AND have users assigned the Project Viewer role, as the vulnerability allows low-privilege Project Viewers to see scrambled secure values in MetaRunner settings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2022.10 or later
Fixed in 2022.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade TeamCity to version 2022.10 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

2022.10 or later

  1. 1. Create a full backup of the TeamCity data directory and database before upgrading
  2. 2. Download TeamCity 2022.10 or later from the official JetBrains website
  3. 3. Stop the TeamCity server gracefully
  4. 4. Run the TeamCity installer/upgrade on the server
  5. 5. Start the TeamCity server after upgrade completes
  6. 6. Verify that Project Viewer role can no longer see scrambled secure values in MetaRunner settings
  7. 7. Review server logs for any upgrade-related errors
Caveat Review TeamCity 2022.10 release notes for any configuration or feature changes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Teamcity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-44623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-44623 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data