CVE-2022-45047
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClass org.apache.sshd.server.keyprovider.SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider in Apache MINA SSHD <= 2.9.1 uses Java deserialization to load a serialized java.security.PrivateKey. The class is one of several implementations that an implementor using Apache MINA SSHD can choose for loading the host keys of an SSH server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache MINA SSHD's SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider class (versions <= 2.9.1) uses unsafe Java deserialization to load serialized java.security.PrivateKey objects. This deserialization of untrusted or potentially tampered key data can be exploited for remote code execution via malicious serialized payloads, as Java deserialization lacks integrity validation by default.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache MINA SSHD library versionSearch for sshd-core or sshd dependencies in your project's build files (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or JAR manifest), or list all SSHD-related JARs in your classpathAffected if The installed version is 2.9.1 or lower
-
Locate SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider usageSearch codebase for references to 'SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider' in Java source files, configuration files, or XML/JSON config files that set up the SSH serverAffected if SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider class is instantiated or configured as the host key provider
-
Check host key provider configurationInspect SSH server initialization code or configuration for properties like 'hostKeyProvider', 'keyPath', or 'keyProvider' that specify which provider class handles host keysAffected if The configuration explicitly uses SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider or its default behavior is relied upon (SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider is the default in affected versions)
-
Inspect key file formatExamine the host key file referenced in configuration - if it is in the old serialized Java format (often .ser extension or binary format starting with specific bytes), it was likely generated by SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProviderAffected if The host key file is stored in serialized Java object format rather than standard OpenSSH key formats (authorized_keys, etc.)
You are affected if you are running Apache MINA SSHD version 2.9.1 or lower AND using SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider to load serialized PrivateKey objects as host keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apache MINA SSHD to a version beyond 2.9.1 that addresses this deserialization flaw, or replace SimpleGeneratorHostKeyProvider with an alternative key provider implementation that does not rely on Java deserialization.
Apache MINA SSHD 2.9.2 or later (preferably latest stable such as 2.9.3 or 3.0.0)
- 1. Identify all Java projects or applications that depend on Apache MINA SSHD library (org.apache.sshd:sshd-core or similar).
- 2. Locate the dependency management file (pom.xml for Maven, build.gradle for Gradle, or similar).
- 3. Search for the sshd-core dependency and note the current version (likely <= 2.9.1).
- 4. Update the version to 2.9.2 or later (recommended: latest stable release such as 2.9.3 or 3.0.0).
- 5. For Maven pom.xml, change the version in the <version> tag, for example: <version>2.9.2</version> to <version>2.9.3</version>.
- 6. Rebuild the project to verify the upgrade does not introduce compilation errors.
- 7. Test the application to ensure SSH server functionality remains intact after the upgrade.
- 8. If using a shaded/uber-jar or bundling SSHD, ensure the bundled library is also updated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-45047 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-45047 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data