FedoraOperating system · Fedoraproject

CVE-2022-45059

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Varnish Cache 7.x before 7.1.2 and 7.2.x before 7.2.1. A request smuggling attack can be performed on Varnish Cache servers by requesting that certain headers are made hop-by-hop, preventing the Varnish Cache servers from forwarding critical headers to the backend.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Varnish Cache versions 7.x before 7.1.2 and 7.2.x before 7.2.1 are vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling via hop-by-hop header manipulation. Attackers can request that certain headers be treated as hop-by-hop, causing Varnish to strip critical headers before forwarding requests to backend servers, potentially allowing cache poisoning or bypass of security controls.

MitigationUpgrade Varnish Cache to version 7.1.2 or 7.2.1 or later. Review VCL configurations for custom header handling that may interact with hop-by-hop headers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 35= 36= 37
Varnish CacheApplication
Affected:>= 7.0.0, < 7.1.2= 7.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Varnish installation
    Run command 'varnishd -V' or check package manager for varnish-cache package
    Affected if Varnish is not installed or version cannot be determined
  2. Determine installed Varnish version
    Execute 'varnishd -V' to retrieve version number; compare against affected ranges (7.0.0 through 7.1.1, or exactly 7.2.0)
    Affected if Version is 7.0.0 through 7.1.1, or version is exactly 7.2.0
  3. Locate VCL configuration files
    Inspect default VCL configuration location (commonly /etc/varnish/ or path specified in varnishd startup parameters)
    Affected if Unable to locate VCL configuration files for review
  4. Review VCL for custom hop-by-hop header handling
    Search VCL files for 'remove' or 'unset' directives targeting HTTP headers, or custom backend response processing that manipulates headers
    Affected if VCL contains explicit removal or manipulation of hop-by-hop headers (such as Connection, Keep-Alive, Transfer-Encoding, or custom headers defined as hop-by-hop)

User is affected if Varnish version is 7.0.0-7.1.1 or exactly 7.2.0, AND VCL configurations explicitly handle or remove hop-by-hop headers in a way that could be exploited for request smuggling.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.1.2 or later
Fixed in 7.1.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Varnish Cache to version 7.1.2 or 7.2.1 or later. Review VCL configurations for custom header handling that may interact with hop-by-hop headers.

Recommended fix High confidence

Varnish Cache 7.1.2 or later (for 7.0.x-7.1.x); Varnish Cache 7.2.1 or later (for 7.2.0)

  1. 1. Check current Varnish Cache version: varnishd -V
  2. 2. For Varnish Cache 7.0.x - 7.1.x: Upgrade to version 7.1.2 or later (7.1.x series)
  3. 3. For Varnish Cache 7.2.0: Upgrade to version 7.2.1 or later (7.2.x series)
  4. 4. On Fedora systems: Run 'dnf update varnish' to apply the latest package
  5. 5. After upgrade, restart the Varnish service: systemctl restart varnish
  6. 6. Verify the new version is running: varnishd -V
  7. 7. Test that the vulnerability is remediated by ensuring hop-by-hop headers are properly forwarded to backends
Caveat Standard minor version upgrade - review release notes for any configuration changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fedora Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-45059 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-45059 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data