CVE-2022-45098
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS, 9.0.0.x-9.4.0.x, contain a cleartext storage of sensitive information vulnerability in S3 component. An authenticated local attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.0.0.x through 9.4.0.x contain a cleartext storage vulnerability in the S3 component, where sensitive information is stored without encryption. An authenticated local attacker with access to the system could read this unencrypted sensitive data, leading to information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.0.25>= 9.2.1.0, < 9.2.1.18>= 9.4.0.0, < 9.4.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed PowerScale OneFS versionRun 'isi version' or check the system information in the OneFS web administration interface under Cluster > OverviewAffected if The version falls within these ranges: 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.24, 9.2.1.0 through 9.2.1.17, or 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.8
-
Verify if the S3 protocol is enabledCheck the S3 service status via 'isi services -a' or navigate to Protocols > S3 in the OneFS web interface to confirm S3 is runningAffected if S3 protocol is actively enabled and running on the cluster
-
Locate S3 configuration and data directoriesInspect the /ifs directory structure, specifically looking under /ifs/.ifs or /var/local/ for S3-related subdirectories such as s3, s3config, or bucket data storesAffected if S3 buckets or configuration files exist in the storage cluster
-
Check file permissions on S3 storage locationsUse 'ls -la' on identified S3 directories and examine ownership and read permissions, particularly for files that may contain credentials, keys, or sensitive configuration dataAffected if Untrusted local authenticated users have read access to S3-related directories or configuration files
The system is affected if PowerScale OneFS version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the S3 protocol is enabled, allowing a local authenticated attacker to read unencrypted sensitive data from S3 storage locations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1.0.259.2.1.189.4.0.9
Apply the vendor patch from Dell to remediate this vulnerability. Until the patch is applied, limit local access to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for unauthorized access to S3-related storage locations.
OneFS 9.1.0.25+ (for 9.1.x), 9.2.1.18+ (for 9.2.x), or 9.4.0.9+ (for 9.4.x)
- 1. Identify the current OneFS version running on the PowerScale cluster using 'isi version' or through the web admin interface
- 2. Based on the current version, determine the appropriate upgrade path to a fixed release
- 3. For 9.1.0.x versions: Upgrade to OneFS 9.1.0.25 or later
- 4. For 9.2.1.x versions: Upgrade to OneFS 9.2.1.18 or later
- 5. For 9.4.0.x versions: Upgrade to OneFS 9.4.0.9 or later
- 6. Before upgrading, review OneFS upgrade prerequisites and create a cluster snapshot or backup
- 7. Follow Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade procedure documented in the OneFS administration guide
- 8. After upgrade, verify the S3 component is functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-45098 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-45098 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data