CVE-2022-45804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RoboSoft Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin <= 3.2.9 leading to galleries hierarchy change, included plugin deactivate & activate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress (versions 3.2.9 and below). The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF tokens on admin actions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended operations including modifying gallery hierarchies and toggling plugin activation status.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Locate 'Robogallery Robo Gallery' or 'Rbs Image Gallery' in the list and note the displayed version number.Affected if The plugin is installed and shows version below 3.2.11
-
Check plugin file version headerAccess the plugin directory via FTP or file manager (wp-content/plugins/). Open the main plugin PHP file (such as robo-gallery.php) and inspect the 'Version:' field in the plugin header comment block at the top of the file.Affected if The Version header in the plugin file is less than 3.2.11
-
Verify nonce implementation in admin actionsExamine the plugin PHP files for admin action handlers. Search for state-changing operations (gallery modifications, activation toggles) and check if they include nonce validation functions such as check_admin_referer(), wp_verify_nonce(), or nonce_field() before processing the request.Affected if State-changing admin actions lack nonce verification and rely only on user authentication without CSRF protection
You are affected if the Robogallery Robo Gallery plugin is installed with version 3.2.9 or below and admin actions do not validate anti-CSRF tokens before executing changes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.11
Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) for all state-changing admin actions and validate these tokens server-side before processing requests. Users should update to a patched version once released.
Robo Gallery version 3.2.11 or later
- Log in to WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find Robo Gallery (Rbs Image Gallery) plugin
- Click Update Now or update to version 3.2.11 or higher
- Verify the plugin is updated to version 3.2.11 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-45804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-45804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data