CVE-2022-45921
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFusionAuth before 1.41.3 allows a file outside of the application root to be viewed or retrieved using an HTTP request. To be specific, an attacker may be able to view or retrieve any file readable by the user running the FusionAuth process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFusionAuth before 1.41.3 contains a path traversal vulnerability in its file serving mechanism. Attackers can craft HTTP requests with directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) to access files outside the intended application root directory. Since the file retrieval runs with the privileges of the FusionAuth process user, any file readable by that user can be exposed, including system files, configuration files, and credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.37.0, < 1.41.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FusionAuth versionLog into the FusionAuth admin dashboard and navigate to System > About, or check the version file typically located at /opt/fusionauth/version.txt (or the installation directory's version.txt). Compare this version against the affected range: >= 1.37.0 and < 1.41.3.Affected if The installed version falls within 1.37.0 through 1.41.2 inclusive.
-
Verify the file serving endpoint is accessibleDetermine if the FusionAuth server is exposed to network access. Check if HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 9011, 8080, or 443) are listening on interfaces accessible to untrusted networks. Review firewall rules and reverse proxy configurations.Affected if The FusionAuth HTTP interface is reachable from untrusted networks and the version is within the affected range.
-
Confirm file serving feature is enabledFusionAuth's file serving is typically used for theme assets and file uploads. Check the FusionAuth configuration file (fusionauth.properties or fusionauth-config.toml) for file serving related settings, or review the installed plugins and theme configurations.Affected if File serving functionality is active and the version is within the affected range.
-
Review FusionAuth process file permissionsCheck the user account running the FusionAuth process (typically found in process listings or service configs) and review which files that user can read. Use commands like 'ps aux | grep fusionauth' to identify the process owner, then review file permissions with 'ls -la' on sensitive directories like /etc, /opt, or application config directories.Affected if The FusionAuth process runs with permissions to read sensitive system or configuration files, and the version is within the affected range.
A system is affected if it runs FusionAuth version 1.37.0 through 1.41.2, has its HTTP interface network-accessible, and the FusionAuth process user has read access to sensitive files that could be exposed via directory traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.41.3
Primary remediation is upgrading FusionAuth to version 1.41.3 or later, which contains the fix for this path traversal vulnerability. As a compensating control, restrict network access to FusionAuth servers and ensure the process runs with minimal necessary file system permissions.
1.41.3 or later
- 1. Back up your FusionAuth database and configuration files before upgrading
- 2. Download FusionAuth version 1.41.3 or later from the official FusionAuth release page
- 3. Stop the FusionAuth service
- 4. Follow the official FusionAuth upgrade instructions for your deployment method
- 5. Start the FusionAuth service after upgrade completes
- 6. Verify the application is functioning correctly and test that the path traversal vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-45921 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-45921 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data