CVE-2022-4608
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in HCI IEC 60870-5-104 function included in certain versions of the RTU500 series product. The vulnerability can only be exploited, if the HCI 60870-5-104 is configured with support for IEC 62351-3. After session resumption interval is expired an RTU500 initiated update of session parameters causes an unexpected restart due to a stack overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack overflow vulnerability exists in the HCI IEC 60870-5-104 function of RTU500 series products. When the HCI 60870-5-104 is configured with IEC 62351-3 support and the session resumption interval expires, an RTU500-initiated update of session parameters triggers a stack overflow causing an unexpected device restart (denial of service).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.3.1= 13.3.2= 13.3.3= 13.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product modelLocate the device model identifier in the RTU500 system inventory, device management interface, or hardware labeling. Confirm it is an RTU500 series device from Hitachi Energy.Affected if The device is not an RTU500 series product - the vulnerability does not apply to other devices.
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the RTU500 firmware management interface, system information panel, or use the vendor-specific command to retrieve the installed firmware version. Compare against the affected versions: 13.3.1, 13.3.2, 13.3.3, and 13.4.1.Affected if The installed firmware version matches exactly 13.3.1, 13.3.2, 13.3.3, or 13.4.1 - other versions are not affected by this specific CVE.
-
Verify HCI IEC 60870-5-104 is configuredCheck the RTU500 protocol configuration settings or HCI module settings to determine if the IEC 60870-5-104 protocol function is enabled and active.Affected if IEC 60870-5-104 is not configured or is disabled - the vulnerability cannot be triggered.
-
Confirm IEC 62351-3 support is enabledInspect the IEC 60870-5-104 security settings or IEC 62351-3 configuration panel to verify whether TLS/SSH security support for IEC 62351-3 is turned on.Affected if IEC 62351-3 support is disabled - the specific stack overflow condition does not occur.
-
Check session resumption intervalReview the IEC 62351-3 session management or TLS session configuration to identify if a session resumption interval is set and configured to expire.Affected if No session resumption interval is configured or it is set to never expire - the trigger condition is not present.
The environment is affected only if the device is an RTU500 with firmware 13.3.1, 13.3.2, 13.3.3, or 13.4.1, AND HCI IEC 60870-5-104 is enabled with IEC 62351-3 support, AND a session resumption interval is configured to expire.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches for the RTU500 series. If no patch is available, consider disabling IEC 62351-3 support if业务ally acceptable, or implement network segmentation to limit exposure to authenticated attackers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-4608 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-4608 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data