Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu FirmwareOperating system · Siemens

CVE-2022-46140

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Affected devices use a weak encryption scheme to encrypt the debug zip file. This could allow an authenticated attacker to decrypt the contents of the file and retrieve debug information about the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Affected devices implement a weak encryption scheme for debug zip files. An attacker with valid authentication credentials can exploit this vulnerability to decrypt the debug archive and access sensitive system information that was intended to be protected.

MitigationReplace the weak encryption scheme with a strong, industry-standard algorithm (e.g., AES-256-GCM) with proper key derivation and random IV generation. Ensure debug files are encrypted with keys derived from secure random sources and not hardcoded.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M804pb FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M812 1 Adsl Router FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M816 1 Adsl Router FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M826 2 Shdsl Router FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M874 2 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Scalance M874 3 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Access the device management interface or use SNMP/sysinfo commands to confirm the exact model number and firmware version. Compare against the list of affected products: Ruggedcom Rm1224 (LTE 4G EU/NAM), Scalance M804pb, M812, M816, M826, M874-2, M874-3.
    Affected if The device model matches any of the affected products listed in the CVE.
  2. Check if debug feature is enabled
    Navigate to the device diagnostic or maintenance settings in the web management interface or CLI. Look for options related to debug logging, diagnostics export, or technical support bundle generation.
    Affected if Debug or diagnostics export functionality is enabled on the device.
  3. Locate debug archive files
    Inspect the device filesystem or any exported backup/diagnostic files for compressed archives (zip files) that contain system diagnostics, logs, or support bundles.
    Affected if Debug zip archives exist on the device or have been exported.
  4. Inspect encryption configuration
    Examine the device configuration files or settings related to archive encryption. Look for parameters specifying the encryption algorithm, key derivation method, and IV generation for debug exports.
    Affected if The encryption scheme uses a weak algorithm or lacks proper key derivation and random IV generation.
  5. Check for hardcoded keys
    Review configuration files or firmware binaries for hardcoded encryption keys, default passwords, or static secrets used for encrypting debug archives.
    Affected if Hardcoded or static encryption keys are found in the device configuration or firmware.

The device is affected if it is one of the listed Siemens Ruggedcom or Scalance models with debug export functionality enabled and uses the default weak encryption scheme for diagnostic archives.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the weak encryption scheme with a strong, industry-standard algorithm (e.g., AES-256-GCM) with proper key derivation and random IV generation. Ensure debug files are encrypted with keys derived from secure random sources and not hardcoded.

Fix this in Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46140 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data