CVE-2022-46303
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCommand injection in SMS notifications in Tribe29 Checkmk <= 2.1.0p10, Checkmk <= 2.0.0p27, and Checkmk <= 1.6.0p29 allows an attacker with User Management permissions, as well as LDAP administrators in certain scenarios, to perform arbitrary commands within the context of the application's local permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the SMS notification functionality of Tribe29 Checkmk allows authenticated attackers with User Management permissions (or LDAP administrators in certain configurations) to execute arbitrary commands with the application's local user privileges. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input sanitization in the SMS notification processing path.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.0= 2.0.0= 1.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Checkmk installation and identify versionLocate the Checkmk installation directory and check the version file or use 'cmk --version' command to determine the installed versionAffected if Installed version is exactly 2.1.0, 2.0.0, or 1.6.0 (without vendor patches)
-
Verify SMS notification feature is configuredAccess Checkmk Setup > Notifications > Notifications and check if any SMS notification rules or notification methods are enabledAffected if SMS notification rules or custom notification scripts are configured and active
-
Identify users with User Management permissionsNavigate to Setup > Users > Roles or check the LDAP/Active Directory integration settings to list accounts with User Management or Administrator privilegesAffected if Multiple users or LDAP admins have User Management permissions, increasing attack surface
-
Review notification script configurationExamine the ~/checkmk/notifications/ or /omd/sites/*/local/lib/python3/cmk/gui/plugins/wato/ directory for custom SMS notification scripts and verify input handlingAffected if Custom notification scripts exist that pass unsanitized user input to shell commands
Your environment is affected if you run Checkmk versions 2.1.0, 2.0.0, or 1.6.0 with SMS notification functionality configured and users who have User Management permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches (Checkmk 2.1.0p11, 2.0.0p28, 1.6.0p30 or later). As an interim control, restrict User Management permissions to only highly trusted administrators and review LDAP configuration settings to limit exposure.
Upgrade to Checkmk 1.6.0p30+ (for 1.6.x), 2.0.0p28+ (for 2.0.x), 2.1.0p11+ (for 2.1.x), or latest stable 2.2.x/2.3.x release
- 1. Identify your current Checkmk version by navigating to 'Setup' > 'General' > 'About Checkmk'
- 2. If running version 1.6.0, upgrade to version 1.6.0p30 or later
- 3. If running version 2.0.0, upgrade to version 2.0.0p28 or later
- 4. If running version 2.1.0, upgrade to version 2.1.0p11 or later
- 5. If running any version between these (e.g., 2.2.x), verify the version is not in the affected range and upgrade to the latest stable release
- 6. After upgrade, verify SMS notification configuration does not contain unexpected commands
- 7. Review user permissions in 'Setup' > 'Users' > 'LDAP' to ensure only trusted administrators have access
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46303 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46303 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data