Enterprise ProtectionApplication · Proofpoint

CVE-2022-46334

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.19.0 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Proofpoint Enterprise Protection (PPS/PoD) contains a vulnerability which allows the pps user to escalate to root privileges due to unnecessary permissions. This affects all versions 8.19.0 and below.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability where the 'pps' service user has unnecessary file system or system permissions that can be leveraged to gain root privileges. This is a classic permission misconfiguration allowing vertical privilege escalation.

MitigationReview and restrict file system and system permissions for the pps user, removing unnecessary privileges. Upgrade to version 8.19.1 or later if a fixed version is available, after testing in a non-production environment.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise ProtectionApplication
Affected:<= 8.19.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Proofpoint Enterprise Protection version
    Locate and read the Proofpoint installation or version file, typically found in /opt/proofpoint or the application installation directory. Use command: grep -i version /opt/proofpoint/*/version 2>/dev/null or check the package manager: rpm -q proofpoint-protection 2>/dev/null
    Affected if The installed version is 8.19.0 or lower
  2. Verify pps service user exists
    Check if the pps user account exists on the system: id pps or grep ^pps: /etc/passwd
    Affected if The pps user account exists on the system
  3. Check file system permissions granted to pps user
    Use 'find' command to locate files or directories writable by pps user: find / -user pps -perm -002 2>/dev/null | head -50. Focus on system directories like /etc, /usr, /var, /opt
    Affected if The pps user has write permissions to system directories or sensitive configuration files
  4. Check sudo privileges for pps user
    Examine sudo configuration for pps user: sudo -l -U pps 2>/dev/null or grep -r ^pps /etc/sudoers /etc/sudoers.d/ 2>/dev/null
    Affected if The pps user has sudo permissions that allow privilege escalation to root
  5. Check for writable scripts or services run as pps
    Identify executable scripts or services owned or writable by pps user in system directories: find /etc /opt /usr -user pps -type f -perm -002 2>/dev/null | grep -E '\.(sh|py|pl|conf|service)$'
    Affected if The pps user owns writable scripts or configuration files that are executed with elevated privileges

A user is affected if Proofpoint Enterprise Protection version 8.19.0 or lower is installed AND the pps service user has excessive file system or system permissions that could be exploited for root privilege escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.19.0
Interim mitigation

Review and restrict file system and system permissions for the pps user, removing unnecessary privileges. Upgrade to version 8.19.1 or later if a fixed version is available, after testing in a non-production environment.

Fix this in Enterprise Protection Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46334 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data