CVE-2022-46347
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.264), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.170), Solid Edge SE2022 (All versions < V222.0MP12), Solid Edge SE2022 (All versions), Solid Edge SE2023 (All versions < V223.0Update2). The affected applications contain an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted X_B files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-19079)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in Parasolid and Solid Edge when parsing specially crafted X_B files. The parsing code writes past the end of an allocated memory buffer, causing memory corruption that can be leveraged for arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 33.1, < 33.1.264>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.170CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Parasolid installationLocate the Parasolid installation directory or check the Siemens software inventory on the systemAffected if Parasolid software is found on the system
-
Determine Parasolid versionFind the version information for the installed Parasolid component (check version file, about dialog, or product information)Affected if Unable to determine version information
-
Compare version to affected rangesCheck if the installed Parasolid version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: >= 33.1 but < 33.1.264, >= 34.0 but < 34.0.252, >= 34.1 but < 34.1.242, or >= 35.0 but < 35.0.170Affected if Installed version matches one of these vulnerable ranges
-
Identify Solid Edge installationLocate Solid Edge installation if present (this product also uses the vulnerable Parasolid component)Affected if Solid Edge software is found on the system
-
Check X_B file handling usageDetermine if the system or application processes X_B files (the vulnerable file format)Affected if X_B file parsing is routinely performed on the system
The environment is affected if Parasolid or Solid Edge with a vulnerable Parasolid version (within the ranges listed) is installed AND the system processes X_B files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26434.0.25234.1.242
Update Parasolid to V33.1.264+, V34.0.252+, V34.1.242+, or V35.0.170+ and Solid Edge to V222.0MP12+ or V223.0Update2+. Until patched, avoid opening X_B files from untrusted sources.
Parasolid: V33.1.264, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.170 (depending on current version line); Solid Edge: V222.0MP12 or V223.0Update2
- 1. Identify the current Parasolid or Solid Edge version by checking the application's About or Help menu
- 2. For Parasolid V33.1.x, upgrade to V33.1.264 or later
- 3. For Parasolid V34.0.x, upgrade to V34.0.252 or later
- 4. For Parasolid V34.1.x, upgrade to V34.1.242 or later
- 5. For Parasolid V35.0.x, upgrade to V35.0.170 or later
- 6. For Solid Edge SE2022, upgrade to V222.0MP12 or later
- 7. For Solid Edge SE2023, upgrade to V223.0Update2 or later
- 8. Verify the update was applied successfully and test that X_B file parsing works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46347 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46347 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data