CVE-2022-46348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.264), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.170), Solid Edge SE2022 (All versions < V222.0MP12), Solid Edge SE2022 (All versions), Solid Edge SE2023 (All versions < V223.0Update2). The affected applications contain an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted X_B files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-19383)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in Parasolid components used by Solid Edge when parsing specially crafted X_B files. The vulnerability allows writing past the end of an allocated buffer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 33.1, < 33.1.264>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.170CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Parasolid or Solid Edge is installedCheck for the presence of Siemens Parasolid components or Solid Edge application on the system. This may be found in program files, or by checking installed programs list.Affected if Either Siemens Parasolid or Solid Edge is present on the system
-
Determine the installed Parasolid versionLocate the Parasolid version information. This is typically available through the Solid Edge application (About menu), or check version information for Parasolid DLLs if accessible on the system.Affected if The exact version cannot be determined or the software is not found
-
Compare against affected version rangesCompare your installed Parasolid version to the following vulnerable ranges: >= 33.1 to < 33.1.264, >= 34.0 to < 34.0.252, >= 34.1 to < 34.1.242, or >= 35.0 to < 35.0.170Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges (33.1.x, 34.0.x, 34.1.x, or 35.0.x before the patch thresholds)
-
Determine X_B file processing exposureAssess whether the system is configured to parse X_B files, which is the attack vector for this vulnerability. X_B is a Parasolid binary file format.Affected if X_B file parsing is enabled or the system processes X_B files from external or untrusted sources
A system is affected if it has Parasolid or Solid Edge installed with a version number matching any of the four vulnerable ranges AND processes X_B files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26434.0.25234.1.242
Update affected Parasolid and Solid Edge installations to the patched versions (V33.1.264, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, V35.0.170, V222.0MP12, or V223.0Update2), and avoid opening untrusted X_B files from unknown sources.
Parasolid: V33.1.264, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.170 (depending on your product line); Solid Edge SE2022: V222.0MP12; Solid Edge SE2023: V223.0Update2
- 1. Identify the current Parasolid or Solid Edge version installed in your environment
- 2. For Parasolid V33.1.x users: Upgrade to version V33.1.264 or later
- 3. For Parasolid V34.0.x users: Upgrade to version V34.0.252 or later
- 4. For Parasolid V34.1.x users: Upgrade to version V34.1.242 or later
- 5. For Parasolid V35.0.x users: Upgrade to version V35.0.170 or later
- 6. For Solid Edge SE2022 users: Upgrade to version V222.0MP12 or later
- 7. For Solid Edge SE2023 users: Upgrade to version V223.0Update2 or later
- 8. Obtain the fixed version from Siemens official support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) or your authorized Siemens distributor
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data