FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla
CVE-2022-46873
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBecause Firefox did not implement the <code>unsafe-hashes</code> CSP directive, an attacker who was able to inject markup into a page otherwise protected by a Content Security Policy may have been able to inject executable script. This would be severely constrained by the specified Content Security Policy of the document. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 108.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFirefox versions prior to 108 did not properly implement the Content Security Policy 'unsafe-hashes' directive. This allowed an attacker with limited markup injection capabilities on a CSP-protected page to potentially inject and execute executable script, though the attack remained constrained by the specified CSP rules.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
< 108.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, click the menu button (three lines), select Help, then About Firefox. The version number is displayed at the top of the dialog.Affected if The version shown is below 108.0 (for example, 107.0, 106.0, etc.)
-
Confirm Firefox update statusIn the About Firefox dialog, check if the application shows it is up to date or if an update is available. If updates are pending or automatic updates are disabled, the browser may be running an outdated version.Affected if Firefox reports an update is available or automatic updates are disabled, and the current version is below 108.0
-
Check for unsafe-hashes CSP usage (web application context)Review web application HTTP response headers or CSP meta tags for the presence of 'unsafe-hashes' directive. Inspect Network tab in browser DevTools or review server-side header configurations.Affected if A web page served to this Firefox instance includes Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag containing 'unsafe-hashes'
You are affected if Firefox version is below 108.0 AND you are accessing or serving web pages that use the CSP 'unsafe-hashes' directive, as the improper implementation allows script execution in that specific CSP configuration context.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped108.0
Update Firefox to version 108 or later to receive the fix for proper unsafe-hashes directive implementation. Organizations should ensure patch management processes cover desktop browser updates.
Firefox 108.0
- Upgrade Firefox to version 108.0 or later to obtain the fix for the missing unsafe-hashes CSP directive implementation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Firefox
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-46873 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-46873 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data