Traffic ServerApplication · Apache

CVE-2022-47184

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-06-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.1.7 / 9.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Traffic Server.This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: 8.0.0 to 9.2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Apache Traffic Server versions 8.0.0 through 9.2.0 contain an information disclosure vulnerability allowing unauthorized actors to access sensitive information. The vulnerability is network-exploitable and rated HIGH severity due to the potential exposure of sensitive data.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 9.2.1 or later to patch the vulnerability, or apply the specific security patch if available from Apache.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Traffic ServerApplication
Affected:>= 8.0.0, < 8.1.7>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.1
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 11.0= 12.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Traffic Server version
    Run 'traffic_server --version' or 'ats -version' to get the installed version number
    Affected if Version output is empty or not found, indicating Traffic Server may not be installed
  2. Compare version against vulnerability ranges
    Compare the installed version to the affected ranges: >= 8.0.0 and < 8.1.7, OR >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.1
    Affected if Installed version falls within either 8.0.0-8.1.6 or 9.0.0-9.2.0
  3. Check Debian package version if applicable
    On Debian systems, run 'dpkg -l | grep traffic-server' or 'apt list --installed | grep traffic-server'
    Affected if Running Debian 11 or 12 with Apache Traffic Server package installed in an affected version
  4. Verify network exposure
    Check if Traffic Server is bound to a network interface and accessible remotely. Review configuration files (records.config, remap.config) and running process bindings using 'netstat -tlnp | grep traffic' or 'ss -tlnp | grep traffic'
    Affected if Service is network-accessible from untrusted networks, as the vulnerability is network-exploitable

User is affected if Apache Traffic Server version is 8.0.0-8.1.6, 9.0.0-9.2.0, or matching Debian package versions on Debian 11/12, AND the service is network accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.1.7 / 9.2.1 or later
Fixed in 8.1.79.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 9.2.1 or later to patch the vulnerability, or apply the specific security patch if available from Apache.

Recommended fix High confidence

Apache Traffic Server 8.1.7 or 9.2.1 (depending on your current major version)

  1. Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 8.1.7 or later for the 8.x line
  2. Alternatively, upgrade to version 9.2.1 or later for the 9.x line
  3. If using Debian, apply the latest Debian security updates for the traffic-server package in Debian 11 (bullseye) and Debian 12 (bookworm)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Traffic Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-47184 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-47184 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data