CVE-2022-47375
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PC-Station Plus (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-2 PN V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414F-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416F-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions), SINAMICS S120 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V5.2 SP3 HF15), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 414-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions), SIPLUS S7-400 CPU 416-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions). The affected products do not handle long file names correctly. This could allow an attacker to create a buffer overflow and create a denial of service condition for the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the file name handling routines of affected Siemens SIMATIC and SINAMICS products. Improper validation of file name length allows a buffer overflow when processing excessively long file names, potentially causing device denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= 4.7= 4.8= 4.9= 5.0= 5.1= 5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SIMATIC PLC modelLocate the hardware identification label on the PLC module or query the device via TIA Portal, STEP 7, or the device's web interface for the exact product order number (MLFB) such as 6es7412-2ek07-0ab0Affected if The product order number matches 6es7412-2ek07-0ab0, 6es7414-3em07-0ab0, 6es7414-3fm07-0ab0, 6es7416-3es07-0ab0, 6es7416-3fs07-0ab0, 6ag1414-3em07-7ab0, or 6ag1416-3es07-7ab0
-
Identify the SINAMICS S120 modelCheck the drive unit nameplate or query via STARTER, SINAMICS Startdrive, or the device's built-in web server for the product designationAffected if The product is a Siemens SINAMICS S120 drive system
-
Check the firmware version of SIMATIC PLCsConnect to the PLC via TIA Portal or STEP 7 and read the firmware version from the device properties, or access via the PLC's web-based management interfaceAffected if The firmware version is any version (all versions of these models are affected)
-
Check the firmware version of SINAMICS S120Query the drive firmware version via STARTER, SINAMICS Startdrive, or the operator panel using the version information screenAffected if The firmware version is 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, or any version (the advisory indicates all versions are affected)
-
Verify if file name handling is accessibleDetermine if the device's file handling routines are exposed to untrusted inputs. This includes assessing whether the device accepts file operations from network sources, removable media, or external memory cards without prior validationAffected if The device processes file names from external or network sources without additional input validation layers
You are affected if you have any of the listed SIMATIC PLC models (6es7412/6es7414/6es7416/6ag1414/6ag1416 series) or a SINAMICS S120 drive, regardless of firmware version, and the device's file name handling functionality is accessible to external or untrusted inputs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedFor SINAMICS S120, upgrade to version V5.2 SP3 HF15 or later. For other affected products, apply vendor-provided patches or implement network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted file inputs.
Sinamics S120: V5.2 SP3 HF15
- For Sinamics S120 (incl. SIPLUS variants): Upgrade firmware to version V5.2 SP3 HF15 or later.
- For SIMATIC S7-400 CPU models (412-2 PN V7, 414-3 PN/DP V7, 414F-3 PN/DP V7, 416-3 PN/DP V7, 416F-3 PN/DP V7) and SIMATIC PC-Station Plus: No fixed version is currently available per this advisory. Contact Siemens for remediation guidance.
- Implement network segmentation and access controls to reduce attack surface until patches are available.
- Monitor Siemens CERT portal for updates to this advisory.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-47375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-47375 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data