CVE-2022-47556
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled resource consumption in ekorRCI, allowing an attacker with low-privileged access to the web server to send continuous legitimate web requests to a functionality that is not properly validated, in order to cause a denial of service (DoS) on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUncontrolled resource consumption in ekorRCI allows an authenticated attacker with low-privileged web server access to send continuous legitimate requests to an unvalidated functionality, causing resource exhaustion and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 601j= 601jCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productCheck system inventory or device identification to confirm whether the device is an Ormazabal Ekorrci or Ormazabal Ekorccp system. Look for product labels, SNMP sysDescr values, or web interface identification strings that match these product names.Affected if The product is Ormazabal Ekorrci or Ormazabal Ekorccp
-
Check firmware versionAccess the device console, web management interface, or check firmware metadata to determine the exact firmware version installed. Look for version string '601j' specifically.Affected if Firmware version equals exactly 601j
-
Verify web server access is enabledCheck the device configuration or network accessibility to confirm whether the embedded web server (HTTP/HTTPS management interface) is enabled and reachable over the network. Look for web service daemon status or listening ports 80/443.Affected if Web server access is enabled and the interface is network-accessible
-
Check for resource limiting on web requestsInspect the web server or application configuration for any rate-limiting, request throttling, or request validation settings that may constrain repeated requests to any functionality.Affected if No rate limiting, throttling, or request validation is configured on the web interface
You are affected only if you have Ormazabal Ekorrci or Ekorccp firmware version exactly 601j with the web management interface enabled and no resource constraints configured on repeated web requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement rate limiting, request throttling, or proper input validation on the affected functionality to constrain resource consumption from repeated requests.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-47556 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-47556 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data