CVE-2022-48322
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi Mesh systems and routers are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. This affects MR60 before 1.1.7.132, MS60 before 1.1.7.132, R6900P before 1.3.3.154, R7000P before 1.3.3.154, R7960P before 1.4.4.94, and R8000P before 1.4.4.94.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNETGEAR Nighthawk routers and mesh systems contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code due to improper bounds checking. The vulnerability affects multiple popular router models (MR60, MS60, R6900P, R7000P, R7960P, R8000P) running firmware versions prior to the patched releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.7.132< 1.1.7.132< 1.3.3.154< 1.3.3.154< 1.4.4.94< 1.4.4.94CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelLocate the model number on the device label or log into the router admin web interface (typically at 192.168.1.1) and check the status or device info pageAffected if The model is one of: MR60, MS60, R6900P, R7000P, R7960P, R8000P
-
Find the installed firmware versionIn the router admin web interface, navigate to Advanced > Administration > Router Update or Check for New Version. The current firmware version is displayed on the status or dashboard pageAffected if Unable to determine the firmware version or version displays as unknown
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesCompare your installed firmware version to the vulnerable thresholds: MR60/MS60 versions below 1.1.7.132; R6900P/R7000P versions below 1.3.3.154; R7960P/R8000P versions below 1.4.4.94Affected if Your installed firmware version falls below the corresponding threshold for your model
-
Check remote administration settingsIn the router admin interface, go to Advanced > Administration > Remote Management. Verify if Remote Management is enabled and which IP addresses are allowedAffected if Remote Management is enabled and accessible from any IP address (0.0.0.0) or from untrusted networks
You are affected if your router model matches one of the six listed models AND your current firmware version is below the patch threshold for that model AND the admin interface is exposed to remote attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.7.1321.3.3.1541.4.4.94
Apply vendor-supplied firmware updates (MR60/MS60 to 1.1.7.132 or later; R6900P/R7000P to 1.3.3.154 or later; R7960P/R8000P to 1.4.4.94 or later). If updates are unavailable, restrict administrative interfaces to trusted networks and monitor for indicators of compromise.
MR60/MS60: Firmware 1.1.7.132 | R6900P/R7000P: Firmware 1.3.3.154 | R7960P/R8000P: Firmware 1.4.4.94
- Access the NETGEAR router web interface by navigating to routerlogin.net or 192.168.1.1 in a web browser
- Log in with the router administrator credentials
- Navigate to the Administration or Advanced settings section
- Locate the Firmware Update or Router Update option
- Check for available updates - the router should show version 1.1.7.132 for MR60/MS60, 1.3.3.154 for R6900P/R7000P, or 1.4.4.94 for R7960P/R8000P as the fixed release
- If the update is not automatically detected, download the firmware from the official NETGEAR support website (kb.netgear.com) for your specific model
- Upload and apply the firmware file through the web interface
- Wait for the router to reboot and complete the update process
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-48322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-48322 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data