CVE-2022-4984
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZenTao Biz < 6.5, ZenTao Max < 3.0, ZenTao Open Source Edition < 16.5, and ZenTao Open Source Edition < 16.5.beta1 contain an SQL injection vulnerability in the login functionality. The application does not properly validate the account parameter on /zentao/user-login.html before using it in a database query. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to execute crafted SQL expressions and retrieve sensitive information from the backend database, including user and application data. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-07 UTC.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in ZenTao project management software's login functionality. The account parameter on /zentao/user-login.html is not properly validated before being used in database queries, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL code and extract sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ZenTao versionCheck the version.php file in the ZenTao installation directory, or access the /zentao/api-getsessionid.html endpoint which returns version info in the response. Alternatively, check the footer of any ZenTao page for the version number.Affected if The installed version is Biz < 6.5, Max < 3.0, or Open Source < 16.5
-
Confirm login endpoint is accessibleAccess the URL /zentao/user-login.html in a web browser or via curl. Verify the page loads and contains a login form with an account parameter input field.Affected if The login page is accessible without authentication and contains an account parameter field
-
Verify SQL injection is possibleSend a test request to /zentao/user-login.html with a benign SQL payload in the account parameter (e.g., account=admin' AND '1'='1) and observe if the application returns different responses compared to a normal request. Use error-based detection by checking for SQL syntax error messages in the response.Affected if The application returns SQL error messages or exhibits different behavior when SQL syntax is injected into the account parameter, indicating the input is not properly sanitized before being used in database queries
A user is affected if ZenTao is running an unpatched version (Biz < 6.5, Max < 3.0, Open Source < 16.5) AND the login page at /zentao/user-login.html is accessible with an account parameter that does not sanitize SQL syntax.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for affected ZenTao versions (Biz < 6.5, Max < 3.0, Open Source < 16.5). If immediate patching is not feasible, implement WAF rules or temporary input validation controls to block SQL injection payloads in the account parameter.
ZenTao Biz 6.5, ZenTao Max 3.0, or ZenTao Open Source Edition 16.5 (depending on edition in use)
- 1. Back up the current ZenTao installation and database before any upgrade
- 2. Identify which ZenTao edition is in use (Biz, Max, or Open Source Edition)
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed version: ZenTao Biz 6.5, ZenTao Max 3.0, or ZenTao Open Source Edition 16.5
- 4. Follow the official ZenTao upgrade guide to install the fixed version
- 5. Verify the login functionality at /zentao/user-login.html works correctly
- 6. Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer exploitable by testing with malicious input in the account parameter
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-4984 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-4984 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data