CVE-2023-0056
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy which could crash the service. This issue could allow an authenticated remote attacker to run a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster. The biggest impact is to availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in HAProxy allows an authenticated remote attacker to deploy a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster, causing HAProxy to crash due to resource exhaustion. The vulnerability requires authentication, which somewhat limits the attack surface, but once exploited it results in complete service unavailability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0all versions= 4.12= 4.10= 4.11= 4.12= 4.10= 4.11= 4.12= 4.10= 4.11= 4.12= 4.10= 4.11= 36= 37all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HAProxy versionRun 'haproxy -v' or check the installed package version (e.g., rpm -q haproxy, dpkg -l haproxy)Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected products (all versions of HAProxy are affected per the CVE data)
-
Confirm OpenShift environmentCheck if HAProxy is running within an OpenShift cluster (oc cluster-info, oc get nodes, or check for openshift-specific namespaces/pods)Affected if HAProxy is deployed in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform versions 4.10, 4.11, or 4.12, or any OpenShift variant for IBM LinuxONE, Power, or Z Systems at those versions
-
Verify authentication exposureDetermine if HAProxy management or backend server configuration is accessible to authenticated users (check OpenShift RBAC policies, router configurations, or whether users can modify backend server definitions)Affected if Authenticated users can deploy or modify backend server configurations in the HAProxy setup
-
Inspect resource limit configurationsReview HAProxy configuration files for backend server constraints, connection timeouts, and max connections settings (typically in /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg or OpenShift router config)Affected if No resource limits, connection timeouts, or backend server constraints are configured, allowing uncontrolled resource consumption by a malicious server
You are affected if HAProxy is running in an OpenShift environment (versions 4.10-4.12) or as part of the listed Red Hat products, and authenticated users can deploy backend servers without proper resource limits configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply proper HAProxy resource limits, connection timeouts, and backend server constraints in the OpenShift environment. Update HAProxy to the latest version if a patch is available, and implement rate limiting and max connections controls for backend servers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0056 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0056 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data