CVE-2023-1054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Music Gallery Site 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/?page=user/manage. The manipulation of the argument id leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-221820.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Music Gallery Site 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'id' parameter at /admin/?page=user/manage. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries, enabling attackers to manipulate query logic, extract data, or potentially execute system commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application is SourceCodester Music Gallery SiteInspect the application's source files or admin panel footer to identify the product name and version. Check the main index file or any readme/setup files included with the deployment.Affected if The application is SourceCodester Music Gallery Site version 1.0.
-
Verify the installation is version 1.0Review version documentation, footer text, or configuration files within the deployment to confirm the exact installed version matches the affected version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Confirm the admin panel is accessibleAttempt to access the /admin/ endpoint or navigate to the admin login page in a web browser. Verify that unauthenticated or low-privilege access is possible to the user management section.Affected if The admin interface at /admin/?page=user/manage is reachable and accepts user input.
-
Check for SQL injection vulnerability in the id parameterSend a crafted request to /admin/?page=user/manage with a malicious 'id' parameter value (such as id=1' OR '1'='1) and observe if the application returns unexpected database errors or altered query results.Affected if The 'id' parameter at /admin/?page=user/manage reflects unsanitized input in SQL queries, causing error messages or unexpected behavior.
Your environment is affected if SourceCodester Music Gallery Site version 1.0 is running and the admin panel at /admin/?page=user/manage is accessible with the 'id' parameter accepting unsanitized SQL input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements. Apply input validation and output encoding. If possible, implement least-privilege database accounts. Consider deploying a WAF as a temporary compensating control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data