CVE-2023-1055
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA flaw in RHDS 11 and 12 causes LDAP browsing to incorrectly decode the userPassword attribute instead of the userCertificate attribute during entry browsing. A local attacker with an account on the system where cockpit-389-ds runs can list processes and display hashed passwords, leading to data confidentiality breach.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.5= 11.6= 12.0= 12.1= 36= 37= 38CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if 389-ds or cockpit-389-ds is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep -E "(389-ds|cockpit-389-ds)"' or check package manager for directory server packagesAffected if The package is installed and the version matches 11.5, 11.6, 12.0, 12.1 for RHDS, or 36, 37, 38 for Fedora
-
Verify the installed directory server versionRun 'rpm -q 389-ds-base' or check the version through the package managerAffected if The installed version equals 11.5, 11.6, 12.0, or 12.1 for Redhat Directory Server, or 36, 37, 38 for Fedora
-
Check if cockpit-389-ds service is activeRun 'systemctl status cockpit-389-ds' or check if the cockpit 389-ds instance is runningAffected if The cockpit-389-ds service is enabled and running, enabling the LDAP browsing interface
-
Review LDAP entry browsing behaviorIf accessible, perform an LDAP browse operation and inspect which attribute is decoded when viewing user entriesAffected if The userPassword attribute is returned/decoded instead of userCertificate when browsing entries
The environment is affected if a vulnerable version of Redhat Directory Server (11.5, 11.6, 12.0, 12.1) or Fedora (36, 37, 38) with cockpit-389-ds is installed and running, allowing a local user to access the LDAP browsing interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for RHDS 11 and 12 to correct the attribute decoding logic. Additionally, restrict local access to the system and implement monitoring for unauthorized process enumeration.
Red Hat Directory Server 11.5.x/11.6.x/12.0.x/12.1.x to latest available RHDS 11.x or 12.x release containing security fixes
- Upgrade Red Hat Directory Server to a version that includes the fix for CVE-2023-1055
- Verify the upgrade by reviewing release notes for security fixes addressing userPassword attribute decoding
- Test in a non-production environment to confirm the vulnerability is resolved
- Deploy the updated version to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1055 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data