CVE-2023-1108
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in undertow. This issue makes achieving a denial of service possible due to an unexpected handshake status updated in SslConduit, where the loop never terminates.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in Undertow's SSL/TLS handshake handling (SslConduit). An unexpected handshake status update creates an infinite loop condition during the SSL handshake process, causing the affected thread to hang and making the service unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 7.0= 1.0.0all versionsall versionsall versions= 7.4all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Undertow is in useCheck application dependencies or server configuration for the undertow-core library. In Java applications, review the pom.xml, build.gradle, or runtime classpath for undertow-core. For Red Hat EAP, check the modules or libs directory for undertow jars.Affected if Undertow is present in the runtime environment
-
Verify SSL/TLS is enabled on UndertowInspect the Undertow server configuration for SSL/TLS listeners. Look for 'https', 'ssl', or 'tls' keywords in the server.xml, standalone.xml, or programmatic configuration. Check if an SSLContext is configured via SslConduit or UndertowBuilder.Affected if SSL/TLS is configured and the server accepts HTTPS connections on an Undertow-based service
-
Confirm product and version against affected listIdentify the specific Red Hat product in use (Quarkus, Decision Manager, Fuse, Camel K, Service Registry, JBoss EAP, or Openshift Application Runtimes) and determine its version. Compare against the affected versions: Quarkus all versions, Decision Manager 7.0, Fuse 1.0.0, Camel K all versions, Service Registry all versions, JBoss EAP all versions and 7.4, EAP Expansion Pack all versions, Openshift Application Runtimes all versions.Affected if The installed product matches any of the affected product/version combinations listed in the CVE
If Undertow is present, SSL/TLS is enabled, and the product version matches the affected list, the environment is vulnerable to the SSL handshake infinite loop causing denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Undertow to a patched version that addresses the handshake loop issue, or apply vendor-supplied security patches.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1108 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.netapp.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- github.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1108 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data