CVE-2023-1322
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in lmxcms 1.41 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function reply of the file BookAction.class.php. The manipulation of the argument id with the input 1) and updatexml(0,concat(0x7e,user()),1)# leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-222728.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in lmxcms 1.41's BookAction.class.php reply function allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL via the id parameter using a time-based or error-based injection payload (e.g., updatexml). The flaw stems from unsanitized user input being directly concatenated into SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.41CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm lmxcms versionLocate the version identifier in your lmxcms installation - typically found in a version.php file, README, or in the admin dashboard under system information. Search for '1.41' or check the main index file for version strings.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.41 (Lmxcms Lmxcms = 1.41)
-
Locate BookAction.class.phpFind the BookAction.class.php file in your lmxcms source code - it is typically located in the lib/action/ or similar directory under the application root. Use a file search or check the /lib/action/ folder.Affected if The file exists in the installation and contains the reply function
-
Verify the reply function existsOpen BookAction.class.php and locate the function named 'reply' or 'Reply' - this is the vulnerable function handling the book comment reply feature.Affected if The reply function is present in BookAction.class.php
-
Check id parameter handling in SQLExamine the reply function code and look for SQL queries that directly use the 'id' parameter from user input without sanitization or parameterization. Look for patterns like $id being concatenated directly into SELECT, UPDATE, or DELETE statements.Affected if The code shows the id parameter being directly concatenated into SQL queries without prepared statements, escaping, or input validation
-
Determine if the reply function is accessibleCheck if the book comment/reply functionality is enabled and accessible on the frontend - typically accessed via a URL path like /index.php?a=reply&m=book or similar routing depending on the lmxcms configuration.Affected if The reply function is publicly accessible and the book comment module is enabled
You are affected if you are running lmxcms version 1.41, the BookAction.class.php file exists with a reply function, and that function directly uses the id parameter in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply input validation and convert the vulnerable SQL queries to use prepared statements/parameterized queries. If an official patch is unavailable, consider disabling the affected reply function until a fix can be implemented.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1322 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data