CVE-2023-1437
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAll versions prior to 9.1.4 of Advantech WebAccess/SCADA are vulnerable to use of untrusted pointers. The RPC arguments the client sent could contain raw memory pointers for the server to use as-is. This could allow an attacker to gain access to the remote file system and the ability to execute commands and overwrite files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdvantech WebAccess/SCADA versions prior to 9.1.4 contain a critical vulnerability in the RPC service where client-supplied arguments contain raw memory pointers that the server uses directly without validation. This allows attackers to perform arbitrary memory access, leading to remote file system access, command execution, and file overwrite capabilities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Advantech WebAccess/SCADA is installedCheck for WebAccess/SCADA installation by looking for the product in Windows Programs and Features ( Programs and Features ), or search for installation directories such as C:\Advantech\WebAccess or C:\WebAccessAffected if The software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionLocate the version information in the installation directory, typically in a file named version.txt, about.txt, or in the program's executable properties. Common paths include C:\Advantech\WebAccess\VERSION or within the main executable's file propertiesAffected if The installed version is any version prior to 9.1.4 (for example, 9.1.3, 9.1.2, 9.0.x, or earlier releases)
-
Confirm the RPC service is enabledCheck if the WebAccess RPC service is running by opening Services (services.msc) and looking for services named WebAccess RPC, Advantech WebAccess RPC, or similar RPC-related services, or check the service configuration in the WebAccess Manager consoleAffected if The RPC service is running or configured to start automatically
-
Assess network exposure of the RPC serviceReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the RPC service ports (typically TCP ports involved in WebAccess communication) are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet. Use netstat -an or the Windows Firewall advanced security settings to identify listening ports associated with WebAccessAffected if The RPC service ports are accessible from untrusted network segments or directly from the internet
The environment is affected if Advantech WebAccess/SCADA version prior to 9.1.4 is installed with the RPC service enabled and exposed to potentially untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1.4
Upgrade to WebAccess/SCADA version 9.1.4 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, isolate the RPC service from untrusted networks and implement strict network segmentation to reduce exposure.
WebAccess/SCADA 9.1.4 or later
- Confirm current WebAccess/SCADA version by checking the application or system information
- Create a full backup of the system including configuration files and databases
- Review Advantech release notes and upgrade documentation for version 9.1.4
- Download WebAccess/SCADA version 9.1.4 or later from the official Advantech support portal
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Apply the upgrade to production systems following standard change management procedures
- Verify the installation was successful and the application functions correctly
- Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by verifying the version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1437 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1437 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data