RobodkApplication

CVE-2023-1516

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-03-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.5.3 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
RoboDK versions 5.5.3 and prior contain an insecure permission assignment to critical directories vulnerability, which could allow a local user to escalate privileges and write files to the RoboDK process and achieve code execution.  

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

RoboDK versions 5.5.3 and prior have insecure permission assignments on critical directories, allowing a local unprivileged user to write files to the RoboDK process directory and achieve code execution through privilege escalation.

MitigationApply secure permissions (restrict write access to privileged/service accounts only) on critical RoboDK directories and update to a patched version if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RobodkApplication
Affected:<= 5.5.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RoboDK installation and version
    Locate the RoboDK installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\RoboDK or C:\RoboDK). Check for a version file or executable properties that display the version number. In the RoboDK folder, look for a version.txt file or right-click on RoboDK.exe and select Properties > Details to view the File Version.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.5.3 or any version prior to 5.5.3
  2. Locate critical RoboDK directories
    Identify the main RoboDK installation directory and any associated process or working directories. Common paths include C:\Program Files\RoboDK, C:\RoboDK, and the user's AppData\Roaming\RoboDK folder. Check the installation folder structure for subdirectories used for plugins, scripts, or user files.
    Affected if Critical directories exist on the system regardless of version, as permission misconfigurations may still be present in older versions
  3. Verify directory write permissions for unprivileged users
    Right-click on the main RoboDK installation folder and select Properties > Security. Check the permissions for Users or Authenticated Users groups. Verify whether these standard user accounts have Write or Modify permissions to the RoboDK directory or its subdirectories.
    Affected if Standard non-admin user accounts (such as Users group) have Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions to the RoboDK installation directory or process directories
  4. Check for unprivileged user write access to process directory
    Using icacls from an elevated command prompt, run: icacls "C:\Program Files\RoboDK" to list permissions. Look for entries showing (CI)(OI)(GR,GW) or explicit Allow Write permissions granted to Users orAuthenticated Users. Alternatively, attempt to create a test file in the directory using a standard user account context.
    Affected if Unprivileged users can write files to directories where the RoboDK process executes or loads modules from

A system is affected if RoboDK version 5.5.3 or prior is installed AND standard non-admin users have Write or Modify permissions to critical RoboDK directories where the application executes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.5.3
Interim mitigation

Apply secure permissions (restrict write access to privileged/service accounts only) on critical RoboDK directories and update to a patched version if available.

Fix this in Robodk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1516 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1516 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data