Openstack PlatformApplication · Redhat

CVE-2023-1633

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A credentials leak flaw was found in OpenStack Barbican. This flaw allows a local authenticated attacker to read the configuration file, gaining access to sensitive credentials.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenStack Barbican key management service contains a local credentials leak vulnerability where an authenticated attacker can read the configuration file and obtain sensitive credentials such as database passwords, API keys, or encryption material.

MitigationReview and restrict file permissions on Barbican configuration files to prevent unauthorized local access, rotate any exposed credentials, and ensure configuration files are not world-readable.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openstack PlatformApplication
Affected:= 16.1= 16.2= 17.0
BarbicanApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Barbican is deployed
    Check if the Barbican service is installed and running on the system. Look for the barbican-api process or check for the presence of Barbican configuration directories.
    Affected if Barbican is installed and running
  2. Locate Barbican configuration files
    Identify the configuration files typically found in /etc/barbican/ or the directory specified in the Barbican deployment. Common files include barbican.conf, paste.ini, or policy.yaml.
    Affected if Configuration files exist on the system
  3. Check file permissions on configuration files
    Run 'ls -la' on the identified configuration files to view permission bits. Look for any permissions that allow reading by users other than the owner or root (e.g., world-readable or group-readable).
    Affected if Configuration files have permissions like 644, 655, or any world-readable (o+r) or group-readable (g+r) setting
  4. Verify credential exposure in configuration
    Examine the configuration files for sensitive parameters such as 'sql_connection', 'database', 'password', 'key', 'secret', or 'token' sections. Check if these contain actual credential values.
    Affected if Database passwords, API keys, encryption keys, or other secrets are present in configuration files and those files are accessible to non-privileged users
  5. Check ownership and access control
    Run 'stat' on configuration files to check ownership. Use 'getfacl' or review /etc/group to determine which users or groups have access to the configuration files.
    Affected if Configuration files are owned by a service account but readable by additional users or groups beyond the intended service user

A user is affected if Barbican configuration files containing sensitive credentials are readable by any user other than the service owner or root.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and restrict file permissions on Barbican configuration files to prevent unauthorized local access, rotate any exposed credentials, and ensure configuration files are not world-readable.

Fix this in Openstack Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1633 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1633 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data