CVE-2023-1697
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Missing Values vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker to cause a dcpfe process core and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt of these specific frames will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition. This issue occurs when a specific malformed ethernet frame is received. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10000 Series, PTX1000 Series Series: All versions prior to 19.4R3-S10; 20.1 version 20.1R1 and later versions; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S1; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2-S1, 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S2, 22.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Junos OS Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker to send malformed ethernet frames that cause the dcpfe process to crash (core), resulting in sustained DoS. The issue stems from improper handling of missing values when processing specific frame types.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 19.4= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the Junos version string (e.g., 19.4R3.5)Affected if The installed version matches any of these: any version below 19.4, exactly 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, or 22.2
-
Check for dcpfe process crashesRun 'show system core-dumps' or 'request system core-dump list' to look for dcpfe-related crash filesAffected if Recent dcpfe core dumps exist, especially if correlated with timing of suspicious network activity
-
Review system logs for PFE errorsRun 'show log messages' and search for entries containing 'dcpfe', 'PFE', 'crash', or 'ethernet frame' errorsAffected if Logs show dcpfe restarts or ethernet frame processing errors from adjacent interfaces
-
Assess network exposure to adjacent attackersVerify interface configurations and firewall policies to determine if the device accepts ethernet frames from untrusted adjacent network segmentsAffected if The device has exposed interfaces in untrusted network segments where unauthenticated attackers could send malformed frames
A user is affected if their Junos version falls within the listed affected versions AND the device is reachable by adjacent attackers on network segments that can send ethernet frames to the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped19.4
Apply Juniper-provided software updates for affected versions (19.4R3-S10+, 20.1R1+, 20.2R3-S6+, etc.) as listed in the advisory. Network segmentation may limit attack surface from adjacent attackers.
19.4R3-S10, 20.2R3-S6, 20.3R3-S6, 20.4R3-S5, 21.1R3-S4, 21.2R3-S3, 21.3R3-S3, 21.4R3-S1, 22.1R3, or 22.2R2 (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version installed on the affected device using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: for 19.4.x upgrade to 19.4R3-S10 or later; for 20.1.x upgrade to 20.2R3-S6 or later; for 20.2.x upgrade to 20.2R3-S6 or later; for 20.3.x upgrade to 20.3R3-S6 or later; for 20.4.x upgrade to 20.4R3-S5 or later
- 3. For 21.x versions: 21.1 to 21.1R3-S4, 21.2 to 21.2R3-S3, 21.3 to 21.3R3-S3, 21.4 to 21.4R3-S1 or later
- 4. For 22.x versions: 22.1 to 22.1R3 or later (or 22.1R2-S1), 22.2 to 22.2R2 or later (or 22.2R1-S2)
- 5. Download the appropriate Junos software package from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 6. Upload the software to the device using 'file copy' or USB transfer
- 7. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
- 8. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command to complete the installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1697 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1697 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data