CVE-2023-1725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Infoline Project Management System allows attackers to make the server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources. This can enable reconnaissance of internal services, access to cloud metadata endpoints, and pivoting to internal networks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.09.31.125CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of Infoline Tr Project Management SystemCheck the application's About page, help menu, or installation directory for version information. On Windows, you may also check Add/Remove Programs or the executable properties. On Linux, check the installed package or the binary version flag.Affected if The version is lower than 4.09.31.125 (e.g., 4.09.31.120, 4.09.30.x, etc.)
-
Locate URL input features in the applicationReview the application's interface for any fields or functions that accept URLs, such as link submission, external resource import, webhook configuration, or document reference features.Affected if The application accepts user-supplied URLs and makes HTTP requests to them without strict validation
-
Check network outbound restrictionsReview firewall rules, proxy configuration, or application network policies to determine if outbound connections from the application server are restricted.Affected if No outbound restrictions are configured and the application can reach arbitrary URLs including internal services or cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254)
You are affected if you are running Infoline Tr Project Management System version below 4.09.31.125 and your application exposes functionality that accepts and processes URLs from users without validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.09.31.125
Upgrade to version 4.09.31.125 or later. Additionally, implement strict allowlist validation for any user-supplied URLs and restrict outbound network connections from the application server.
4.09.31.125
- Obtain the Infoline Project Management System version 4.09.31.125 or later from the official vendor
- Backup the current database and configuration files before upgrading
- Stop the Project Management System service
- Deploy the updated version 4.09.31.125
- Verify the service starts correctly
- Test that the application functions normally post-upgrade
- Validate that the SSRF vulnerability is no longer present by testing internal resource access attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data