CVE-2023-20026
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320 and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user input within incoming HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain root-level privileges and access unauthorized data. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have valid administrative credentials on the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a command injection vulnerability in Cisco Small Business RV series routers (RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, RV325). The web-based management interface fails to properly validate user input within HTTP packets, allowing an authenticated attacker with administrative credentials to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands with root-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router's web management interface and navigate to Status > System Summary, or check the device label/hardware markings to confirm the model number is one of: RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, or RV325Affected if The model is any of RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, or RV325
-
Confirm firmware versionIn the web interface, go to Status > System Summary or Administration > Firmware Upgrade to view the installed firmware version. Compare against the affected range.Affected if All firmware versions are affected for the listed models, so any version confirms exposure
-
Verify web management interface is enabledIn the web interface, go to Administration > Management > HTTP/HTTPS to check if the web-based management interface is enabledAffected if HTTP or HTTPS management is enabled - this is the attack surface for the vulnerability
-
Check if remote management is accessibleIn the web interface, go to Administration > Management > Remote Management to determine if the management interface is accessible from the WAN/internet side, or test connectivity to ports 80/443 from an external networkAffected if Remote management is enabled and the interface is reachable from outside trusted networks - this increases exposure to unauthenticated network attackers (though the CVE requires authenticated access)
-
Review administrative account accessCheck Administration > User Management to enumerate administrative accounts. Determine if weak or default credentials are in use, or if the administrative interface is accessible to untrusted usersAffected if The web management interface is accessible to users who may have obtained administrative credentials
You are affected if you have any of these router models (RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, RV325) with the web management interface enabled, as all firmware versions contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the available Cisco firmware update for affected router models. Until patched, restrict access to the web management interface to trusted networks only, use strong administrative credentials, and disable remote management if not required.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20026 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data