CVE-2023-20105
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the change password functionality of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with Read-only credentials to elevate privileges to Administrator on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of password change requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the application as a Read-only user and sending a crafted request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the passwords of any user on the system, including an administrative user, and then impersonate that user. Note: Cisco Expressway Series refers to the Expressway Control (Expressway-C) device and the Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthenticated privilege escalation in Cisco Expressway Series and TelePresence VCS where a Read-only user can send crafted requests to the web management interface to change passwords of any user including administrators, due to incorrect handling of password change authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= x14.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Telepresence VCS or Expressway installationCheck system inventory or run 'show version' on the device CLI to confirm the product nameAffected if Product is Cisco Telepresence Video Communication Server or Cisco Expressway Series
-
Check installed software versionUse CLI command 'xStatus' or access the web interface System Information page to view the exact version numberAffected if Version is x14.0.3 or earlier (any version <= x14.0.3)
-
Verify web management interface is enabledCheck the device configuration via CLI using 'xConfiguration SystemUnitWebServer' or inspect HTTP/HTTPS accessibility on port 443Affected if Web management interface is enabled and accessible
-
Confirm presence of Read-only user accountsReview user accounts in the web interface under User Settings or use CLI 'xConfiguration User' to list all defined usersAffected if One or more Read-only user accounts exist in the system
-
Audit for password change operations in logsReview System Logs (Event Log) in the web interface or use CLI 'eventlog' command, focusing on password modification eventsAffected if Logs show password changes performed by Read-only users or unexpected password modifications
The environment is affected if Cisco Telepresence VCS or Expressway version is x14.0.3 or earlier and the web management interface with Read-only users is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco security patches when available; restrict management interface access to trusted networks; monitor for unauthorized password change activity; consider network segmentation for management interfaces.
Any version greater than x14.0.3 (e.g., x14.1 or later, or the latest available stable release)
- Confirm current version of Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) or Cisco Expressway Series
- Download and install the latest available version from Cisco software downloads at software.cisco.com
- After upgrade, verify that the password change vulnerability is resolved by testing with a Read-only account
- Ensure all user passwords are rotated after the upgrade as a security best practice
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20105 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data