CVE-2023-20121
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the restricted shell of Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM), Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), and Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, local attacker to escape the restricted shell and gain root privileges on the underlying operating system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in the restricted shell of Cisco EPNM, ISE, and Prime Infrastructure allow authenticated local attackers to escape the restricted shell and execute commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.0.1= 3.2< 3.10.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if affected Cisco products are installedCheck for running processes or installation directories: look for 'epnm', 'ise', or 'prime' related processes, or check common installation paths like /opt/CSCOepnm, /opt/CSCOise, /opt/piAffected if Any of these Cisco products (EPNM, ISE, or Prime Infrastructure) are installed on the system
-
Check Cisco EPNM versionIf EPNM is installed, run 'show version' in the EPNM CLI or check /opt/CSCOepnm/version.txt for the installed versionAffected if Installed version is lower than 7.0.1
-
Check Cisco ISE versionIf ISE is installed, run 'ise version' in the ISE CLI or check the admin web interface under Administration > System > System Info for the versionAffected if Installed version equals 3.2 (exact match)
-
Check Cisco Prime Infrastructure versionIf Prime Infrastructure is installed, run 'show version' in the PI CLI or check /opt/PI/version.txt for the installed versionAffected if Installed version is lower than 3.10.4
-
Verify local administrative access existsReview local user accounts that have shell or CLI access to the affected system, as the vulnerability requires authenticated local accessAffected if Local user accounts with shell or restricted shell access exist on the affected product
The environment is affected if any of these Cisco products (EPNM < 7.0.1, ISE = 3.2, or Prime Infrastructure < 3.10.4) are installed and local authenticated users have access to the restricted shell.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.10.47.0.1
Apply the vendor patches released by Cisco for the affected products; restrict local administrative access and monitor for unauthorized privilege escalation attempts.
EPNM: 7.0.1+ | ISE: see Cisco advisory for fixed version | Prime Infrastructure: 3.10.4+
- 1. Identify the current version of the affected Cisco product (EPNM, ISE, or Prime Infrastructure) using the product's web interface or CLI
- 2. For Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM): Download and install version 7.0.1 or later from Cisco's software download center
- 3. For Cisco Prime Infrastructure: Download and install version 3.10.4 or later from Cisco's software download center
- 4. For Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE): Check the Cisco advisory for the specific fixed version for ISE 3.2 (the advisory at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com contains complete fix information)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the restricted shell configuration and test that command injection is no longer possible
- 6. Review user access to ensure only authorized personnel have authenticated local access
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20121 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20121 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data