CVE-2023-20125
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the local interface of Cisco BroadWorks Network Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exhaust system resources, causing a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability exists because rate limiting does not occur for certain incoming TCP connections. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high rate of TCP connections to the server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause TCP connection resources to grow rapidly until the Cisco BroadWorks Network Server becomes unusable. Note: To recover from this vulnerability, either Cisco BroadWorks Network Server software must be restarted or the Cisco BroadWorks Network Server node must be rebooted. For more information, see the section of this advisory. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Cisco BroadWorks Network Server's local interface where lack of rate limiting on certain incoming TCP connections allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to rapidly exhaust TCP connection resources. Successful exploitation renders the server unusable until restart or reboot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco BroadWorks Network Server is installedIdentify the running product by checking system inventory, installed packages, or running processes for 'BroadWorks' or 'bw' related services. On the server, run: ps aux | grep -i broadworks or check installed software packages.Affected if The system is running Cisco BroadWorks Network Server software.
-
Verify TCP connection handling configurationReview the BroadWorks configuration files and CLI settings for any rate limiting, connection throttling, or connection pool limits applied to incoming TCP connections. Check configuration directories typically under /opt/broadworks or as specified in your deployment.Affected if No rate limiting or connection throttling is configured for incoming TCP connections.
-
Monitor current TCP connection stateRun netstat -an | grep -c ESTABLISHED or ss -tan state established to observe the current number of active TCP connections. Compare against expected baseline for your deployment.Affected if Connection counts rapidly increase beyond normal operational levels without rate limiting enforcement.
-
Check for connection resource exhaustion symptomsReview system logs (/var/log/messages, /var/log/syslog) and BroadWorks application logs for warnings about connection limits, file descriptor exhaustion, or memory pressure related to TCP connections.Affected if Logs show connection resource warnings or the server becomes unresponsive due to connection table exhaustion.
-
Compare installed BroadWorks version to patch statusQuery the installed BroadWorks version via CLI (typically 'show version' or 'admin> show system info') and compare against the Cisco advisory to determine if the security update has been applied.Affected if The installed version is older than the patched release that addresses CVE-2023-20125.
A defender is affected if they run Cisco BroadWorks Network Server without the security update applied and without external rate limiting controls on incoming TCP connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco software update to address the missing rate limiting. Since no workarounds exist, patching is the only remediation path.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,336.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20125 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20125 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data