CVE-2023-20186
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to bypass command authorization and copy files to or from the file system of an affected device using the Secure Copy Protocol (SCP). This vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of SCP commands in AAA command authorization checks. An attacker with valid credentials and level 15 privileges could exploit this vulnerability by using SCP to connect to an affected device from an external machine. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain or change the configuration of the affected device and put files on or retrieve files from the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS/IOS XE Software's AAA feature allows authenticated remote attackers with level 15 privileges to bypass command authorization when using SCP. The flaw is in how SCP commands are processed through AAA authorization checks, enabling attackers to copy files to/from the device filesystem and potentially obtain or modify device configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2\(58\)ex= 12.2\(58\)ey= 12.2\(58\)ey1= 12.2\(58\)ey2= 12.2\(58\)ez= 12.2\(58\)se= 12.2\(58\)se1= 12.2\(58\)se2= 12.2\(60\)ez= 12.2\(60\)ez1= 12.2\(60\)ez2= 12.2\(60\)ez3= 3.2.0se= 3.2.1se= 3.2.2se= 3.2.3se= 3.3.0se= 3.3.0sg= 3.3.0xo= 3.3.1se= 3.3.1sg= 3.3.1xo= 3.3.2se= 3.3.2sgCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Cisco IOS or IOS XE versionRun the command 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the version string in the outputAffected if The displayed version matches any of the following: Cisco iOS 12.2(58)ex, 12.2(58)ey, 12.2(58)ey1, 12.2(58)ey2, 12.2(58)ez, 12.2(58)se, 12.2(58)se1, 12.2(58)se2, 12.2(60)ez, 12.2(60)ez1, 12.2(60)ez2, 12.2(60)ez3 OR Cisco IOS XE 3.2.0se through 3.3.2sg (specific releases include 3.2.xse, 3.3.0se, 3.3
-
Verify if SCP server is enabledRun the command 'show ip scp' or check the configuration with 'show running-config | include scp'Affected if The output shows SCP server is enabled or configured on the device
-
Confirm AAA authorization is configured for exec and command accessRun 'show running-config | include aaa authorization' to view AAA authorization policiesAffected if AAA authorization is configured and includes exec or commands, but the device is running an affected version; the vulnerability bypasses these checks for SCP traffic
-
Check for level 15 user accounts with network accessReview the output of 'show users' and 'show running-config | include username' to identify privileged level 15 accountsAffected if Level 15 privilege accounts exist and have network access, which combined with an affected version and SCP enabled creates the exploitation condition
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Cisco iOS or IOS XE version from the listed ranges, has SCP server enabled, and has AAA authorization configured with level 15 privileged accounts accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch/ios update for CVE-2023-20186 when available. Until then, restrict SCP access via AAA authorization policies and monitor for unauthorized file transfers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20186 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data