CVE-2023-20199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco Duo Two-Factor Authentication for macOS could allow an authenticated, physical attacker to bypass secondary authentication and access an affected macOS device. This vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of responses from Cisco Duo when the application is configured to fail open. An attacker with primary user credentials could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to authenticate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the affected device without valid permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Duo Two-Factor Authentication for macOS contains a vulnerability where incorrect handling of authentication responses when configured to 'fail open' allows an authenticated attacker with primary user credentials to bypass secondary 2FA and gain access to the affected macOS device without valid permission.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Cisco Duo version installed on macOSOpen Terminal and run: ls /Applications | grep -i duo to locate the app, then check the version using: defaults read /Applications/Duo\ Security.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleShortVersionString or system_profiler SPApplicationsDataType | grep -A5 DuoAffected if The version shown is 2.0.0, 2.0.1, or 2.0.2 (any version >=2.0.0 and <2.0.2)
-
Verify Duo authentication policy configurationOpen Cisco Duo Admin Panel and navigate to the macOS endpoint policy settings, or check the local Duo configuration file at ~/Library/Preferences/com.duosecurity.duo.plist for the 'fail_open' or 'failopen' settingAffected if The policy is set to allow 'fail open' behavior, meaning authentication attempts succeed when Duo cannot reach the verification server
-
Confirm primary credential availability to potential attackerReview system access logs or directory service (such as Active Directory or local accounts) to determine if an attacker already has valid primary (first-factor) credentials for the macOS user accountAffected if Valid primary user credentials exist that could be combined with the fail-open configuration to bypass the secondary factor
You are affected if Cisco Duo for macOS version 2.0.0 through 2.0.2 is installed AND the fail-open authentication policy is enabled, allowing an attacker with primary credentials to bypass 2FA.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.2
Configure Cisco Duo to fail closed rather than fail open, or update to the latest version if a patch is available, to ensure authentication attempts are properly denied when Duo cannot validate the secondary factor.
Cisco Duo Two-Factor Authentication for macOS version 2.0.2 or later
- Verify the current installed version of Cisco Duo Two-Factor Authentication for macOS by checking the application in /Applications or via system preferences
- Navigate to the official Cisco Duo downloads page or your organization's Duo admin console to obtain the latest version
- Download Cisco Duo for macOS version 2.0.2 or later
- Quit the running Duo Authentication app if currently active
- Install the new version by running the downloaded installer package
- Restart the Duo Authentication service or reboot the macOS device to ensure the update takes effect
- Verify the installed version is now 2.0.2 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data