CVE-2023-20207
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the logging component of Cisco Duo Authentication Proxy could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. This vulnerability exists because certain unencrypted credentials are stored. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the logs on an affected system and obtaining credentials that they may not normally have access to. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in clear text.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Cisco Duo Authentication Proxy logging component stores certain credentials in unencrypted (clear text) format. An authenticated remote attacker with access to system logs can read these exposed credentials, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive authentication data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.8.1= 6.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Duo Authentication Proxy versionLocate the Duo Authentication Proxy installation and retrieve its version number using the software's version command or checking the installed package informationAffected if The installed version is exactly 5.8.1 or exactly 6.0.0
-
Verify logging functionality is enabledCheck the Duo Authentication Proxy configuration files and settings to determine if the logging component is activeAffected if Logging is enabled and configured to write to disk-based log files
-
Locate log file directoriesIdentify the directories where Duo Authentication Proxy stores its log files, typically found in the installation directory or system log locationsAffected if Log files exist and are accessible on the system
-
Inspect log file contents for credentialsSearch through the log files for patterns that resemble credentials, API keys, secrets, or authentication tokens stored in clear textAffected if Log files contain unencrypted credentials, API keys, or authentication secrets
-
Verify log file access controlsCheck file permissions on the log directories and files to determine if unauthorized users or processes can read themAffected if Log files are readable by users or processes other than the Duo Authentication Proxy service account
A system is affected if Duo Authentication Proxy version 5.8.1 or 6.0.0 is installed with logging enabled and log files are accessible to unauthorized users who could read exposed credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict access to log files via file permissions and access controls, implement log sanitization to prevent credential capture, rotate any exposed credentials, and apply vendor patches if available.
Upgrade to Authentication Proxy version 5.8.2 or later (5.x branch), or 6.0.1 or later (6.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Cisco Duo Authentication Proxy by checking the proxy version or system information.
- 2. Confirm the affected versions (5.8.1 or 6.0.0) are in use.
- 3. Access the Cisco Duo Admin Panel or use command-line tools to check for available updates.
- 4. Upgrade to the fixed release version that addresses CVE-2023-20207 - typically this would be version 5.8.2 or later for the 5.x branch, or version 6.0.1 or later for the 6.x branch.
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the logging configuration has been updated and no longer stores credentials in clear text.
- 6. Review the new log files to confirm sensitive information is no longer visible in plaintext.
- 7. Implement least-privilege access controls on log directories to limit who can read authentication proxy logs.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20207 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20207 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data