CVE-2023-20234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to create a file or overwrite any file on the filesystem of an affected device, including system files. The vulnerability occurs because there is no validation of parameters when a specific CLI command is used. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to an affected device and using the command at the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite any file on the disk of the affected device, including system files. The attacker must have valid administrative credentials on the affected device to exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the Cisco FXOS Software CLI lacks parameter validation for a specific command, allowing an authenticated administrator to create or overwrite any file on the filesystem, including critical system files. This local privilege escalation stems from insufficient input sanitization in the CLI command parser.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco FXOS or Firepower systemRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' in the FXOS CLI to confirm the platform is Cisco Firepower Extensible Operating SystemAffected if The system runs any version of Cisco FXOS or Firepower Software
-
Confirm CLI access is enabledCheck if the FXOS CLI service is accessible via console, SSH, or management interface by attempting connection or reviewing management configurationAffected if CLI access is enabled and reachable (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Locate the vulnerable CLI commandReview Cisco FXOS CLI command reference documentation for commands that handle file operations (such as 'write' or file-creation commands) without proper path validationAffected if The vulnerable file-write command exists in the CLI and is accessible to authenticated administrators
-
Check for anomalous file write operationsReview system logs, audit logs, or file integrity monitoring alerts for unexpected file creation or modification events, especially in system directoriesAffected if Logs show file writes to system directories initiated through the CLI that were not performed by known trusted administrators
-
Audit administrator accounts and CLI session loggingRun 'show admin' or review authentication logs to list admin accounts with CLI access, and verify CLI command logging is enabledAffected if Multiple administrator accounts exist with CLI access and CLI command execution logging is not enabled or not retained
A user is affected if they are running any version of Cisco FXOS/Firepower with the CLI accessible to authenticated administrators, and the vulnerable file-write command is present in their CLI version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco patch when available. Until then, strictly limit CLI access to trusted administrators only and monitor for anomalous file operations.
Contact Cisco TAC for the specific fixed FXOS release (this CVE was fixed in a subsequent FXOS release; Cisco issues per-release fixes)
- 1. Identify the current FXOS version by running 'show version' at the FXOS CLI
- 2. Contact Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) or check the Cisco FXOS software download page for the latest fixed release
- 3. Download the fixed FXOS software version recommended by Cisco for this vulnerability
- 4. Follow the Cisco FXOS upgrade procedure documented in the Cisco FXOS Software Upgrade Guide
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'show version' and confirming the fixed version is installed
- 6. Validate that the specific CLI command no longer allows unauthorized file overwriting
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data