Control Id IdsecureApplication · Assaabloy

CVE-2023-2044

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-04-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in Control iD iDSecure 4.7.29.1 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Dispositivos Page. The manipulation of the argument IP-DNS leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. VDB-225922 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Dispositivos (Devices) page of Control iD iDSecure version 4.7.29.1. The IP-DNS parameter lacks proper input sanitization, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the browsers of users viewing the device configuration page.

MitigationImplement contextual output encoding for all user-supplied input rendered in the Dispositivos page and add input validation for the IP-DNS field. Since the vendor has not responded, consider deploying a WAF rule to block XSS payloads targeting this parameter as a compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Control Id IdsecureApplication
Affected:= 4.7.29.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify iDSecure version
    Locate the iDSecure installation and check the software version. This is typically found in the web interface footer, the about page, or in the Windows Programs list if installed locally. Common paths: login to the web console and look for version info in the footer or Help > About.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.7.29.1 (no other versions are listed as affected)
  2. Confirm Dispositivos page access
    Navigate to the Dispositivos (Devices) section in the iDSecure web interface. This is typically found in the navigation menu under Devices, Dispositivos, or a similar localization.
    Affected if The Dispositivos page is accessible and loads successfully in the web interface
  3. Identify IP-DNS parameter presence
    In the Dispositivos page, locate the device configuration form and identify the IP-DNS field. This field is used to configure DNS settings for network-connected devices managed by iDSecure.
    Affected if The IP-DNS input field exists in the device configuration form on the Dispositivos page
  4. Test XSS payload injection (if authorized)
    If you have authorization for security testing, submit a benign XSS test payload such as <script>alert('XSS')</script> in the IP-DNS field, save the configuration, then view the page again to see if the script executes.
    Affected if The payload executes and triggers a JavaScript alert, confirming the stored XSS vulnerability

You are affected if your iDSecure version is exactly 4.7.29.1 and the Dispositivos page with the IP-DNS parameter is accessible in your environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement contextual output encoding for all user-supplied input rendered in the Dispositivos page and add input validation for the IP-DNS field. Since the vendor has not responded, consider deploying a WAF rule to block XSS payloads targeting this parameter as a compensating control.

Fix this in Control Id Idsecure Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2044 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data