CVE-2023-20578
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA TOCTOU (Time-Of-Check-Time-Of-Use) in SMM may allow an attacker with ring0 privileges and access to the BIOS menu or UEFI shell to modify the communications buffer potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Time-Of-Check-Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in System Management Mode (SMM) allows an attacker with ring0 privileges and physical access to BIOS/UEFI shell to modify the SMM communications buffer, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution at the highest CPU privilege level (ring -2).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2< genoapi_1.0.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc CPU modelRun 'dmidecode -t processor' or check /proc/cpuinfo to confirm the exact CPU model number (e.g., 8024pn, 8024p, 8124pn, 8124p, 8224pn, 8224p, 8324pn, 8324p)Affected if The CPU model is one of the listed affected Epyc variants (8024pn/p, 8124pn/p, 8224pn/p, 8324pn/p)
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the BIOS/UEFI setup or use 'dmidecode -t bios' to retrieve the firmware version. Identify the genoapi component version - look for a version string like 'genoapi_1.0.0.x' in the firmware release notes or BIOS informationAffected if The genoapi firmware version is present and is less than 1.0.0.2 (e.g., 1.0.0.1, 1.0.0.0, or not listed)
-
Verify SMM is enabledFrom the BIOS/UEFI setup menu, check the 'System Management Mode' or 'SMM' configuration settings. On Linux, you can also check 'cat /sys/firmware/acpi tables' or use 'msr' tools to read SMM-related MSRs if availableAffected if SMM is enabled and the system uses one of the affected CPU/firmware combinations
-
Assess physical access exposureEvaluate whether untrusted individuals could gain physical access to the system and reach the BIOS/UEFI shell (e.g., console access, boot menu, or firmware configuration)Affected if Physical access to the BIOS/UEFI interface is possible for untrusted actors
-
Audit privileged access (ring0)Review which accounts or processes have root/kernel-level (ring0) privileges on the system using 'whoami', 'id', or by checking /etc/passwd and sudoers configuration. Check for unauthorized kernel modules or driversAffected if Multiple untrusted users or processes have ring0 privileges, increasing the attack surface for this vulnerability
A system is affected if it runs an AMD Epyc 8024/8124/8224/8324 variant with genoapi firmware version below 1.0.0.2 and has SMM enabled with exposure to untrusted physical or ring0 access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided firmware updates (BIOS/UEFI) that address this SMM TOCTOU vulnerability. Restrict physical access to systems and limit privileged access to trusted personnel only.
genoapi_1.0.0.2
- Identify the current firmware version by checking the BIOS/UEFI settings or using system information tools
- Download the updated firmware (genoapi_1.0.0.2 or later) from the official AMD support website for your specific Epyc processor model
- Verify the integrity of the downloaded firmware package using checksums provided by AMD
- Access the BIOS/UEFI firmware update utility or use AMD's firmware update tools (such as AMDs UpdateNVRAM or equivalent)
- Apply the firmware update following AMD's documented update procedure for the specific Epyc model
- After update completion, verify the firmware has been successfully applied by checking the BIOS version or system information
- Reboot the system to ensure the new firmware is fully initialized
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20578 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20578 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data