CVE-2023-20588
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA division-by-zero error on some AMD processors can potentially return speculative data resulting in loss of confidentiality.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA division-by-zero error in the execution unit of certain AMD processors can cause speculative data to be returned, potentially exposing confidential information through speculative execution side channels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0= 12.0= 37= 38= 39all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CPU modelRun 'lscpu | grep -E "^(Model name|Vendor)"' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -E "^model name|^vendor_id"' to see the processor installedAffected if The CPU is not an AMD Epyc processor from the 7000 series (specifically 7351p, 7401p, 7551p, 7251, 7261, or 7281)
-
Verify affected Epyc model numbersCompare your Epyc model number against the affected list: 7351p, 7401p, 7551p, 7251, 7261, 7281. Use 'lscpu' to see the full model nameAffected if The installed Epyc processor matches one of these specific models: 7351p, 7401p, 7551p, 7251, 7261, or 7281
-
Check microcode versionOn Linux, check microcode version with 'dmesg | grep -i microcode' or read from '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/microcode/version' if available. On Windows, use 'wmic cpu get version' or check BIOS firmware versionAffected if The microcode/firmware version is older than the patched version provided by AMD (no specific version number in CVE data, so any unpatched system is affected)
Your system is affected if you are running one of the specific AMD Epyc 7000 series processors (7351p, 7401p, 7551p, 7251, 7261, or 7281) with unpatched firmware or microcode.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply AMD processor microcode/firmware updates (BIOS/UEFI updates) provided by AMD to patch the vulnerability on affected systems.
AMD CPU firmware - obtain fixed firmware from AMD for your specific Epyc model
- Contact AMD for the latest CPU firmware/microcode update for your specific Epyc processor model (7351p, 7401p, 7551p, 7251, 7261, or 7281)
- Apply the AMD firmware update following AMD's published instructions for your server platform
- For Linux systems, ensure firmware updates are applied at boot time - verify microcode loading is enabled in bootloader configuration
- For Debian: Install amd64-microcode or linux-firmware packages if provided by Debian to include updated CPU microcode
- For Fedora: Ensure microcode_ctl package is installed and updated to receive CPU microcode updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20588 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.amd.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- xenbits.xen.org
- lists.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- security.netapp.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20588 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data