CVE-2023-2061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of Hard-coded Password vulnerability in FTP function on Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series EtherNet/IP module RJ71EIP91 and MELSEC iQ-F Series EtherNet/IP module FX5-ENET/IP allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain a hard-coded password and access to the module via FTP.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA hard-coded password vulnerability exists in the FTP service of Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series EtherNet/IP module RJ71EIP91 and MELSEC iQ-F Series EtherNet/IP module FX5-ENET/IP, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain the embedded credentials and gain unauthorized FTP access to the affected modules.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed EtherNet/IP module modelLocate the physical module or check the system configuration for the model number - look for FX5-ENET/IP, RJ71EIP91, or the Sw1dnn EipctBd/Sw1dnn Eipctfx5Bd modules in the MELSEC iQ-R or iQ-F series PLC configurationAffected if The module is one of: FX5-ENET/IP, RJ71EIP91, Sw1dnn EipctBd, or Sw1dnn Eipctfx5Bd
-
Verify FTP service is enabled on the moduleAccess the module configuration via the engineering software (GX Works3 for iQ-F, GX Works3 or MR Configurator2 for iQ-R) and check the FTP settings in the EtherNet/IP module parameters. Alternatively, attempt to connect to TCP port 21 on the module IP addressAffected if FTP service is enabled and accessible on the network
-
Confirm the FTP credentials have not been changed from defaultsCheck the FTP user account settings in the module configuration. Compare against any documentation of custom credentials that should have been set. If the original hard-coded credentials are still in use, the system is vulnerableAffected if The default hard-coded FTP credentials are still configured or in use, or no custom credentials have been set
-
Check network exposure of the FTP serviceReview firewall rules, network segmentation, and access control lists to determine if the FTP port (TCP 21) is exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The FTP service is reachable from untrusted network segments or directly from the internet
-
Review FTP access logs for unauthorized access attemptsExamine any available FTP server logs or network traffic logs for connections using default or unknown credentials, successful or failed FTP logins from unexpected IP addressesAffected if There are FTP connection attempts or successful logins that did not originate from authorized administrators
The environment is affected if an FX5-ENET/IP or RJ71EIP91 (or related Sw1dnn variants) EtherNet/IP module with FTP enabled is in use, and the hard-coded default FTP credentials have not been changed to unique values.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataChange the hard-coded FTP credentials to strong, unique passwords, apply available firmware updates from Mitsubishi Electric, and disable FTP if not required or restrict network access to trusted IP addresses.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data