CVE-2023-20666
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn display drm, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07310651; Issue ID: ALPS07292173.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing bounds check in the display DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) component allows an out-of-bounds write, which can be exploited for local privilege escalation. The vulnerability requires System-level execution privileges to exploit, and user interaction is not needed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0= 13.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if The version is exactly 12.0 or 13.0 (not 12L, 12S, 13.0.0, or later point releases)
-
Verify security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' or check Settings > About Phone > Security patch levelAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the date when ALPS07310651 was released (patch date not specified in CVE data)
-
Check kernel DRM driver versionRun 'cat /proc/version' to identify the kernel version, then check if the display DRM module is loaded via 'lsmod | grep -i drm' or inspect /sys/module/drm*Affected if The DRM driver module exists and was not compiled with the bounds check fix (no direct file version check possible without source comparison)
You are affected if your device runs Android 12.0 or 13.0 exactly and has a security patch level older than the fix release date for CVE-2023-20666.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply patch ALPS07310651 to address the missing bounds check in the display DRM component. This is a kernel/driver-level fix that should be integrated into the system image via OTA or firmware update.
Latest Android Security Patch Level (contact device manufacturer for specific version containing ALPS07310651)
- 1. Check your device's current Android Security Patch Level in Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- 2. Ensure your device has the latest Android system updates installed by checking for updates in Settings > System > Software Update
- 3. Contact your device manufacturer (e.g., Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, etc.) to confirm they have released a security update containing the MediaTek display DRM patch (Patch ID: ALPS07310651)
- 4. If available, install the latest security update that addresses CVE-2023-20666
- 5. Verify the Security Patch Level has been updated to include the fix for this vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20666 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20666 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data