CVE-2023-20861
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Spring Framework versions 6.0.0 - 6.0.6, 5.3.0 - 5.3.25, 5.2.0.RELEASE - 5.2.22.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL expression that may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Spring Framework's SpEL (Spring Expression Language) evaluation engine. By providing a specially crafted SpEL expression, an attacker can trigger excessive resource consumption leading to application unavailability. The vulnerability affects versions 6.0.0-6.0.6, 5.3.0-5.3.25, 5.2.0-5.2.22, and older unsupported releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2.22>= 5.3.0, <= 5.3.25>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Spring Framework JAR filesSearch the application deployment for spring-*.jar files (such as spring-core, spring-context, spring-expression) in lib directories, WEB-INF/lib, or within packaged archives. Note the version numbers in the filenames.Affected if Spring Framework JARs are present at versions 6.0.0-6.0.6, 5.3.0-5.3.25, 5.2.0-5.2.22, or older unsupported versions.
-
Check build configuration for Spring dependency versionsReview pom.xml, build.gradle, or similar build files for Spring Framework dependencies (spring-core, spring-beans, spring-context) and note the declared version.Affected if The declared Spring Framework version falls within 6.0.0 to 6.0.6, 5.3.0 to 5.3.25, 5.2.0 to 5.2.22, or is an older release.
-
Inspect MANIFEST.MF files for Spring version metadataOpen the MANIFEST.MF file inside Spring JARs (spring-core.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF) and look for the Implementation-Version attribute.Affected if The Implementation-Version matches affected ranges listed above.
-
Identify SpEL expression evaluation codeSearch source code for imports and usage of org.springframework.expression.* classes, particularly SpelExpressionParser, Expression, or @Value annotations that evaluate SpEL. Also search for references to 'T(...)' SpEL function calls.Affected if The application evaluates SpEL expressions, especially if user-controlled input is passed to the expression parser.
The environment is affected if Spring Framework is present at a version within 6.0.0-6.0.6, 5.3.0-5.3.25, 5.2.0-5.2.22, or older unsupported versions AND the application uses SpEL expression evaluation with external input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Spring Framework to version 6.0.7+, 5.3.26+, or 5.2.23+ as appropriate. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, avoid passing user-supplied input directly into SpEL expression evaluation.
Spring Framework 5.2.23, 5.3.26, or 6.0.7 (stay within your current minor version line)
- Identify your current Spring Framework version by checking your project dependencies (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle)
- For Spring Framework 5.2.x users: Upgrade to version 5.2.23 or later
- For Spring Framework 5.3.x users: Upgrade to version 5.3.26 or later
- For Spring Framework 6.0.x users: Upgrade to version 6.0.7 or later
- Update the Spring Framework dependency in your build configuration file
- Rebuild and test your application to ensure functionality is preserved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20861 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20861 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data