CVE-2023-21216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem of physmem_osmem_linux.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem function in physmem_osmem_linux.c within the Linux kernel's physical memory management subsystem. The memory corruption bug can be exploited by a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution at kernel privilege level, leading to local privilege escalation without requiring any additional privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the kernel versionOn Android, run 'cat /proc/version' or check 'Settings > About Phone > Kernel Version' to retrieve the running kernel versionAffected if The device runs any unpatched Android kernel version
-
Check for physmem_osmem_linux.c moduleSearch for the physmem_osmem_linux.ko module or the physmem_osmem_linux.c source file in the kernel build: 'find /system/lib/modules -name "physmem_osmem*"' or grep for 'physmem_osmem' in /proc/kallsymsAffected if The kernel includes the physmem_osmem Linux kernel module (indicating the vulnerable code path exists)
-
Verify PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem function presenceCheck if the PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem function symbol exists in the running kernel: 'grep -i PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem /proc/kallsyms' or examine the kernelSymbols fileAffected if The function PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem is exported or present in the kernel, indicating the vulnerable code path is compiled in
-
Confirm Android framework usageVerify the device is running Android OS by checking '/system/build.prop' for 'ro.build.fingerprint' or running 'getprop ro.build.version.release'Affected if The device runs Google Android OS (the only product listed as affected)
A device is affected if it runs Google Android with a kernel that contains the physmem_osmem_linux.c module and PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem function without the upstream Linux kernel patch applied to fix the use-after-free vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the upstream Linux kernel patch that fixes the use-after-free in PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem. Deploy the patched kernel version to all affected systems and schedule reboots as needed.
Android November 2023 Security Bulletin (or later) - kernel patch level 2023-11-01 or higher
- Check your Android device's current security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android version
- Verify if your device has received the November 2023 Android Security Update or later
- If not available, contact your device manufacturer or carrier for the latest security patch
- For custom ROMs or AOSP builds, ensure you are running a kernel version that includes the fix for CVE-2023-21216 in physmem_osmem_linux.c
- The fix addresses a use-after-free vulnerability in PMRChangeSparseMemOSMem that could allow local privilege escalation in the kernel
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-21216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-21216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data