CVE-2023-2203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the WebKitGTK package. An improper input validation issue may lead to a use-after-free vulnerability. This flaw allows attackers with network access to pass specially crafted web content files, causing a denial of service or arbitrary code execution. This CVE exists because of a CVE-2023-28205 security regression for the WebKitGTK package in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in WebKitGTK due to improper input validation when processing specially crafted web content files. This is a security regression from CVE-2023-28205 affecting RHEL 8.8 and 9.2, allowing remote attackers with network access to potentially execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 8.8= 9.2= 8.8= 9.2= 8.8= 2.38.5-1.el8= 2.38.5-1.el9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if WebKitGTK is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep -i webkit' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i webkit' to list installed WebKit packagesAffected if Package names containing webkit2gtk3 or webkitgtk3 are found
-
Identify the exact WebKitGTK versionRun 'rpm -q webkit2gtk3' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -s libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37' (Debian) to get the precise version numberAffected if The version number is 2.38.5-1.el8 or 2.38.5-1.el9 (or any version at or below these on RHEL systems)
-
Check the Red Hat Enterprise Linux versionRun 'cat /etc/redhat-release' to confirm the RHEL versionAffected if The system runs RHEL 8.0, 9.0, 8.8, 9.2, or related EUS/Aus/Tus variants with the vulnerable WebKit version installed
-
Determine if applications process web contentIdentify applications using WebKitGTK (such as web browsers, email clients, or HTML preview components) and check if they handle untrusted web content or HTML files from external sourcesAffected if Applications that use WebKitGTK to process HTML or web content from untrusted sources are in use
-
Audit WebKitGTK library usageRun 'ldd /path/to/application | grep webkit' or check /usr/lib*/libwebkit* to see which applications link to the WebKit libraryAffected if Any application dynamically linked to the vulnerable WebKitGTK library is present
The system is affected if it runs RHEL 8.x or 9.x (particularly 8.0, 8.8, 9.0, 9.2) with WebKitGTK version 2.38.5-1.el8 or 2.38.5-1.el9 installed and processes untrusted web content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the WebKitGTK security update for RHEL 8.8 and 9.2 to address the regression, and restrict untrusted web content from being processed by the affected application until patches are applied.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux update channels (via dnf/yum) - the fixed version is available through RHN/Red Hat Satellite
- Run 'sudo dnf check-update' or 'sudo yum check-update' to check for available updates for the webkit2gtk3 package
- Run 'sudo dnf update webkit2gtk3' or 'sudo yum update webkit2gtk3' to apply the security patch
- Reboot the system if the webkit2gtk library is in use by critical services to ensure the updated library is loaded
- Verify the update was successful by running 'rpm -qa | grep webkit2gtk3' to confirm the new version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-2203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-2203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data